Quantification of Chronic Functional Mitral Regurgitation by Automated 3-Dimensional Peak and Integrated Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area and Stroke Volume Techniques Using Real-Time 3-Dimensional Volume Color Doppler Echocardiography

Author:

Thavendiranathan Paaladinesh1,Liu Shizhen1,Datta Saurabh1,Rajagopalan Sanjay1,Ryan Thomas1,Igo Stephen R.1,Jackson Matthew S.1,Little Stephen H.1,De Michelis Nathalie1,Vannan Mani A.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (P.T., S.L., S.R., T.R., M.A.V.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, Mountain View, CA (S.D.); The Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX (S.R.I., M.S.J., S.H.L); and University of California Irvine, Orange, CA (N.D.M.).

Abstract

Background— The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of an automated 3-dimensional (3D) proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) (in vitro and patients) and stroke volume technique (patients) to assess mitral regurgitation (MR) severity using real-time volume color flow Doppler transthoracic echocardiography. Methods and Results— Using an in vitro model of MR, the effective regurgitant orifice area and regurgitant volume (RVol) were measured by the PISA technique using 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D (automated true 3D PISA) transthoracic echocardiography. The mean anatomic regurgitant orifice area (0.35±0.10 cm 2 ) was underestimated to a greater degree by the 2D (0.12±0.05 cm 2 ) than the 3D method (0.25±0.10 cm 2 ; P <0.001 for both). Compared with the flowmeter (40±14 mL), the RVol by 2D PISA (20±19 mL) was underestimated ( P <0.001), but the 3D peak (43±16 mL) and integrated PISA-based (38±14 mL) RVol were comparable ( P >0.05 for both). In patients (n=30, functional MR), 3D effective regurgitant orifice area correlated well with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging RVol r =0.84 and regurgitant fraction r =0.80. Compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging RVol (33±22 mL), the integrated PISA RVol (34±26 mL; P =0.42) was not significantly different; however, the peak PISA RVol was higher (48±27 mL; P <0.001). In addition, RVol calculated as the difference in automated mitral and aortic stroke volumes by real-time 3D volume color flow Doppler echocardiography was not significantly different from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (34±21 versus 33±22 mL; P =0.33). Conclusions— Automated real-time 3D volume color flow Doppler based 3D PISA is more accurate than the 2D PISA method to quantify MR. In patients with functional MR, the 3D RVol by integrated PISA is more accurate than a peak PISA technique. Automated 3D stroke volume measurement can also be used as an adjunctive method to quantify MR severity.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3