Validation Study of Image-Based Fractional Flow Reserve During Coronary Angiography

Author:

Pellicano Mariano1,Lavi Ifat1,De Bruyne Bernard1,Vaknin-Assa Hana1,Assali Abid1,Valtzer Orna1,Lotringer Yonit1,Weisz Giora1,Almagor Yaron1,Xaplanteris Panagiotis1,Kirtane Ajay J.1,Codner Pablo1,Leon Martin B.1,Kornowski Ran1

Affiliation:

1. From the Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Hospital, Belgium (M.P., B.D.B., P.X.); Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel (I.L., H.V.-A., A.A., O.V., P.C., R.K.); Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Italy (M.P.); CathWorks Ltd, Ra’anana, Israel (I.L., O.V., Y.L.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital (A.J.K., P.C., M.B.L.); and Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (G.W., Y.A.).

Abstract

Background— Fractional flow reserve (FFR), an index of the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenoses, is derived from invasive measurements and requires a pressure-monitoring guidewire and hyperemic stimulus. Angiography-derived FFR measurements (FFR angio ) may have several advantages. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance and interobserver reproducibility of FFR angio in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Methods and Results— FFR angio is a computational method based on rapid flow analysis for the assessment of FFR. FFR angio uses the patient’s hemodynamic data and routine angiograms to generate a complete 3-dimensional coronary tree with color-coded FFR values at any epicardial location. Hyperemic flow ratio is derived from an automatic resistance-based lumped model of the entire coronary tree. A total of 203 lesions were analyzed in 184 patients from 4 centers. Values derived using FFR angio ranged from 0.5 to 0.97 (median 0.85) and correlated closely (Spearman ρ=0.90; P <0.001) with the invasive FFR measurements, which ranged from 0.5 to 1 (median 0.84). In Bland–Altman analyses, the 95% limits of agreement between these methods ranged from −0.096 to 0.112. Using an FFR cutoff value of 0.80, the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of FFR angio were 88%, 95%, and 93%, respectively. The intraclass coefficient between 2 blinded operators was 0.962 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.950 to 0.971, P <0.001. Conclusions— There is a high concordance between FFR angio and invasive FFR. The color-coded display of FFR values during coronary angiography facilitates the integration of physiology and anatomy for decision making on revascularization in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03005028.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3