Clinical Effectiveness of Sacubitril/Valsartan Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Author:

Greene Stephen J.12ORCID,Choi Sujung3,Lippmann Steven J.3,Mentz Robert J.12ORCID,Greiner Melissa A.3,Hardy N. Chantelle3,Hammill Bradley G.3ORCID,Luo Nancy4ORCID,Samsky Marc D.12ORCID,Heidenreich Paul A.5ORCID,Laskey Warren K.6,Yancy Clyde W.7ORCID,Peterson Pamela N.89ORCID,Curtis Lesley H.13ORCID,Hernandez Adrian F.12ORCID,Fonarow Gregg C.10ORCID,O'Brien Emily C.13

Affiliation:

1. Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NC

2. Division of Cardiology Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC

3. Department of Population Health Sciences Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC

4. Dignity Health Heart and Vascular Institute Sacramento CA

5. Department of Medicine Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System Palo Alto CA

6. Division of Cardiology University of New Mexico School of Medicine Albuquerque NM

7. Division of Cardiology Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL

8. Division of Cardiology University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora CO

9. Division of Cardiology Denver Health Medical Center Denver CO

10. Ahmanson‐UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA

Abstract

Background Sacubitril/Valsartan has been highly efficacious in randomized trials of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan in older patients hospitalized for HFrEF in real‐world US practice is unclear. Methods and Results This study included Medicare beneficiaries age ≥65 years who were hospitalized for HFrEF ≤40% in the Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure registry between October 2015 and December 2018, and eligible for sacubitril/valsartan. Associations between discharge prescription of sacubitril/valsartan and clinical outcomes were assessed after inverse probability of treatment weighting and adjustment for other HFrEF medications. Overall, 1551 (10.9%) patients were discharged on sacubitril/valsartan. Of those not prescribed sacubitril/valsartan, 7857 (62.0%) were prescribed an angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker. Over 12‐month follow‐up, compared with a discharge prescription of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker, sacubitril/valsartan was independently associated with lower all‐cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72–0.94; P =0.004) but not all‐cause hospitalization (adjusted HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89–1.07; P =0.55) or heart failure hospitalization (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.91–1.18; P =0.59). Patients prescribed sacubitril/valsartan versus those without a prescription had lower risk of all‐cause mortality (adjusted HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60–0.79; P <0.001), all‐cause hospitalization (adjusted HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82–0.98; P =0.02), but not heart failure hospitalization (adjusted HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.82–1.08; P =0.40). Conclusions Among patients hospitalized for HFrEF, prescription of sacubitril/valsartan at discharge was independently associated with reduced postdischarge mortality compared with angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker, and reduced mortality and all‐cause hospitalization compared with no sacubitril/valsartan. These findings support the use of sacubitril/valsartan to improve postdischarge outcomes among older patients hospitalized for HFrEF in routine US clinical practice.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America;Yancy CW;Circulation,2017

2. Angiotensin–Neprilysin Inhibition versus Enalapril in Heart Failure

3. Angiotensin–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

4. Medical Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

5. Titration of Medical Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3