Early Serial Assessment of Aggregate Vasoactive Support and Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry

Author:

Patel Siddharth M.1,Berg David D.1ORCID,Bohula Erin A.1ORCID,Baird-Zars Vivian M.1,Barsness Gregory W.2ORCID,Chaudhry Sunit-Preet3ORCID,Chonde Meshe D.4ORCID,Cooper Howard A.5,Ginder Curtis1ORCID,Jentzer Jacob C.2,Kontos Michael C.6,Miller P. Elliott7ORCID,Newby L. Kristin8ORCID,O’Brien Connor G.9ORCID,Park Jeong-Gun1ORCID,Pierce Matthew J.10ORCID,Pisani Barbara A.11ORCID,Potter Brian J.12ORCID,Shah Kevin S.13,Teuteberg Jeffrey J.14ORCID,Katz Jason N.15ORCID,van Diepen Sean16ORCID,Morrow David A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., C.G., J.-G.P., D.A.M.).

2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (G.W.B., J.C.J.).

3. Department of Cardiology, St Vincent Heart Center, Indianapolis, IN (S.-P.C.).

4. Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (M.D.C.).

5. Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY (H.A.C.).

6. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.C.K.).

7. Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (P.E.M.).

8. Division of Cardiology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (L.K.N.).

9. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco (C.G.O.B.).

10. Department of Cardiology, Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY (M.J.P.).

11. Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (B.A.P.).

12. Cardiology Service, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal Research Center and Cardiovascular Center, Quebec, QC, Canada (B.J.P.).

13. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (K.S.S.).

14. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA (J.J.T.).

15. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York (J.N.K.).

16. Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (S.v.D.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Associations of early changes in vasoactive support with cardiogenic shock (CS) mortality remain incompletely defined. METHODS: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter registry of cardiac intensive care units. Patients admitted with CS (2018–2023) had vasoactive dosing assessed at 4 and 24 hours from cardiac intensive care unit admission and quantified by the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS). Prognostic associations of VIS at both time points, as well as change in VIS from 4 to 24 hours, were examined. Interaction testing was performed based on mechanical circulatory support status. RESULTS: Among 3665 patients, 82% had a change in VIS <10, with 7% and 11% having a ≥10-point increase and decrease from 4 to 24 hours, respectively. The 4 and 24-hour VIS were each associated with cardiac intensive care unit mortality (13%–45% and 11%–73% for VIS <10 to ≥40, respectively; P trend <0.0001 for each). Stratifying by the 4-hour VIS, changes in VIS from 4 to 24 hours had a graded association with mortality, ranging from a 2- to >4-fold difference in mortality comparing those with a ≥10-point increase to ≥10-point decrease in VIS ( P trend <0.0001). The change in VIS alone provided good discrimination of cardiac intensive care unit mortality (C-statistic, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.70–0.75]) and improved discrimination of the 24-hour Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (0.72 [95% CI, 0.69–0.74] to 0.76 [95% CI, 0.74–0.78]) and the clinician-assessed Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions shock stage (0.72 [95% CI, 0.70–0.74] to 0.77 [95% CI, 0.75–0.79]). Although present in both groups, the mortality risk associated with VIS was attenuated in patients managed with versus without mechanical circulatory support (odds ratio per 10-point higher 24-hour VIS, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.23–1.49] versus 1.84 [95% CI, 1.69–2.01]; P interaction <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Early changes in the magnitude of vasoactive support in CS are associated with a gradient of risk for mortality. These data suggest that early VIS trajectory may improve CS prognostication, with the potential to be leveraged for clinical decision-making and research applications in CS.

Funder

HHS | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3