Ambulatory Blood Pressure Changes After Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension

Author:

Mahfoud Felix1,Ukena Christian1,Schmieder Roland E.1,Cremers Bodo1,Rump Lars C.1,Vonend Oliver1,Weil Joachim1,Schmidt Martin1,Hoppe Uta C.1,Zeller Thomas1,Bauer Axel1,Ott Christian1,Blessing Erwin1,Sobotka Paul A.1,Krum Henry1,Schlaich Markus1,Esler Murray1,Böhm Michael1

Affiliation:

1. From the Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany (F.M., C.U., B.C., M.B.); Medizinische Klinik IV, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany (R.E.S., C.O.); Klinik für Nephrologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany (L.C.R., O.V.); Medizinische Klinik 2, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany (J.W.); Klinik für Kardiologie, Klinikum München-Bogenhausen, Germany (M.S.);...

Abstract

Background— Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) reduces office blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant hypertension according to office BP. Less is known about the effect of RDN on 24-hour BP measured by ambulatory BP monitoring and correlates of response in individuals with true or pseudoresistant hypertension. Methods and Results— A total of 346 uncontrolled hypertensive patients, separated according to daytime ambulatory BP monitoring into 303 with true resistant (office systolic BP [SBP] 172.2±22 mm Hg; 24-hour SBP 154±16.2 mm Hg) and 43 with pseudoresistant hypertension (office SBP 161.2±20.3 mm Hg; 24-hour SBP 121.1±19.6 mm Hg), from 10 centers were studied. At 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up, office SBP was reduced by 21.5/23.7/27.3 mm Hg, office diastolic BP by 8.9/9.5/11.7 mm Hg, and pulse pressure by 13.4/14.2/14.9 mm Hg (n=245/236/90; P for all <0.001), respectively. In patients with true treatment resistance there was a significant reduction with RDN in 24-hour SBP (−10.1/−10.2/−11.7 mm Hg, P <0.001), diastolic BP (−4.8/−4.9/−7.4 mm Hg, P <0.001), maximum SBP (−11.7/−10.0/−6.1 mm Hg, P <0.001) and minimum SBP (−6.0/−9.4/−13.1 mm Hg, P <0.001) at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. There was no effect on ambulatory BP monitoring in pseudoresistant patients, whereas office BP was reduced to a similar extent. RDN was equally effective in reducing BP in different subgroups of patients. Office SBP at baseline was the only independent correlate of BP response. Conclusions— RDN reduced office BP and improved relevant aspects of ambulatory BP monitoring, commonly linked to high cardiovascular risk, in patients with true-treatment resistant hypertension, whereas it only affected office BP in pseudoresistant hypertension. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT00664638 and NCT00888433.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3