Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Risk Stratification of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism

Author:

Louzada Martha L.1,Carrier Marc1,Lazo-Langner Alejandro1,Dao Vi1,Kovacs Michael J.1,Ramsay Timothy O.1,Rodger Marc A.1,Zhang Jerry1,Lee Agnes Y.Y.1,Meyer Guy1,Wells Philip S.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, London Health and Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada (M.L.L., A.L.-L., M.J.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada (M.C., J.Z., T.O.R., M.A.R., P.S.W.); Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada (V.D.); Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of British...

Abstract

Background— Long-term low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the current standard for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. Whether treatment strategies should vary according to individual risk of VTE recurrence remains unknown. We performed a retrospective cohort study and a validation study in patients with cancer-associated VTE to derive a clinical prediction rule that stratifies VTE recurrence risk. Methods and Results— The cohort study of 543 patients determined the model with the best classification performance included 4 independent predictors (sex, primary tumor site, stage, and prior VTE) with 100% sensitivity, a wide separation of recurrence rates, 98.1% negative predictive value, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.16. In this model, the score sum ranged between −3 and 3 score points. Patients with a score ≤0 had low risk (≤4.5%) for recurrence and patients with a score >1 had a high risk (≥19%) for VTE recurrence. Subsequently, we applied and validated the rule in an independent set of 819 patients from 2 randomized, controlled trials comparing low-molecular-weight heparin to coumarin treatment in cancer patients. Conclusions— By identifying VTE recurrence risk in cancer patients with VTE, we may be able to tailor treatment, improving clinical outcomes while minimizing costs.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3