Time to Epinephrine Administration and Survival From Nonshockable Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Among Children and Adults

Author:

Hansen Matthew1,Schmicker Robert H.2,Newgard Craig D.,Grunau Brian3,Scheuermeyer Frank4,Cheskes Sheldon5,Vithalani Veer6,Alnaji Fuad7,Rea Thomas8,Idris Ahamed H.9,Herren Heather2,Hutchison Jamie10,Austin Mike11,Egan Debra12,Daya Mohamud1

Affiliation:

1. Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.H., M.D.).

2. Clinical Trial Center (R.H.S., H.H.)

3. Department of Emergency Medicine (B.G.)

4. Department of Emergency Medicine, St Paul’s Hospital (F.S.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

5. Sunnybrook Center for Prehospital Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michaels Hospital (S.C.)

6. Office of the Medical Director, MedStar Mobile Healthcare, Fort Worth, TX (V.V.).

7. Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (F.A.).

8. Department of Internal Medicine (T.R.), University of Washington, Seattle.

9. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (A.H.I.).

10. Departments of Critical Care and Pediatrics (J.H.), University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

11. Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ontario, Canada (M.A.).

12. National Center for Complimentary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (D.E.).

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that earlier epinephrine administration is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with shockable initial rhythms. However, the effect of epinephrine timing on patients with nonshockable initial rhythms is unclear. The objective of this study was to measure the association between time to epinephrine administration and survival in adults and children with emergency medical services (EMS)–treated OHCA with nonshockable initial rhythms. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of OHCAs prospectively identified by the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium network from June 4, 2011, to June 30, 2015. We included patients of all ages with an EMS-treated OHCA and an initial nonshockable rhythm. We excluded those with return of spontaneous circulation in <10 minutes. We conducted a subgroup analysis involving patients <18 years of age. The primary exposure was time (minutes) from arrival of the first EMS agency to the first dose of epinephrine. Secondary exposure was time to epinephrine dichotomized as early (<10 minutes) or late (≥10 minutes). The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. We adjusted for Utstein covariates and Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium study site. Results: From 55 568 EMS-treated OHCAs, 32 101 patients with initial nonshockable rhythms were included. There were 12 238 in the early group, 14 517 in the late group, and 5346 not treated with epinephrine. After adjusting for potential confounders, each minute from EMS arrival to epinephrine administration was associated with a 4% decrease in odds of survival for adults, odds ratio=0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.95–0.98). A subgroup analysis (n=13 290) examining neurological outcomes showed a similar association (adjusted odds ratio, 0.94 per minute; 95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.98). When epinephrine was given late in comparison with early, odds of survival were 18% lower (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.68–0.98). In a pediatric analysis (n=595), odds of survival were 9% lower (odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.81–1.01) for each minute delay in epinephrine. Conclusions: Among OHCAs with nonshockable initial rhythms, the majority of patients were administered epinephrine >10 minutes after EMS arrival. Each minute delay in epinephrine administration was associated with decreased survival and unfavorable neurological outcomes. EMS agencies should consider strategies to reduce epinephrine administration times in patients with initial nonshockable rhythms.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3