Affiliation:
1. From the Istituto di Cardiologia, Università di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi (P.O., F.S., R.M.T.C., A. Marzocchi); Unità Operativa di Cardiologia–Centro Interventistico, Ospedale S. Maria delle Croci, Ravenna (M.B., A. Maresta); Unità Operativa di Cardiologia, Ospedale degli Infermi, Rimini (G.P.); Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale Maggiore, Parma (A. Menozzi); Unità Operativa di Cardiologia Interventistica, Ospedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia (V.G.); Divisione di Cardiologia,...
Abstract
Background—
The long-term effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DES) in unselected diabetics in routine practice is currently unclear.
Methods and Results—
To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of bare metal stents and DES in a real-world setting of diabetic patients, we analyzed 2-year follow-up data from all diabetic patients with de novo lesions enrolled in a prospective Web-based multicenter registry (Registro Regionale Angioplastiche dell’Emilia-Romagna; study period, 2002 to 2004) comprising all 13 hospitals performing percutaneous coronary interventions in the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy. Among the 1648 eligible patients treated with either bare metal stents alone (n=1089) or DES alone (n=559), 27% were insulin dependent and 83% had multivessel coronary disease. At 2 years, use of DES was associated with lower crude incidence of major adverse cardiac advents (all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) compared with bare metal stents (22.5% versus 28.1%;
P
=0.01). After propensity score adjustment, only target vessel revascularization appeared significantly lower in the DES group (11.6% versus 15.0%; hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.96;
P
=0.041). Two-year angiographic stent thrombosis occurred in 1.5% DES patients and 0.7% of the bare-metal-stents patients (
P
=0.18). At Cox regression analysis, predictors of 2-year major adverse cardiac advents were left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, Charlson comorbidity index, insulin-dependent diabetes, and total lesion length.
Conclusions—
In this large, real-world, diabetic population, the use of DES was associated with a moderate reduction in the 2-year risk of target vessel revascularization, a benefit that was limited to non–insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Larger long-term studies are needed to clarify the long-term effectiveness and safety of such devices in diabetic patients.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cited by
66 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献