Two-Year Clinical Outcomes With Drug-Eluting Stents for Diabetic Patients With De Novo Coronary Lesions

Author:

Ortolani Paolo1,Balducelli Marco1,Marzaroli Paolo1,Piovaccari Giancarlo1,Menozzi Alberto1,Guiducci Vincenzo1,Sangiorgio Pietro1,Tarantino Fabio1,Geraci Giuseppe1,Castriota Fausto1,Tondi Stefano1,Saia Francesco1,Cooke Robin M.T.1,Guastaroba Paolo1,Grilli Roberto1,Marzocchi Antonio1,Maresta Aleardo1

Affiliation:

1. From the Istituto di Cardiologia, Università di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi (P.O., F.S., R.M.T.C., A. Marzocchi); Unità Operativa di Cardiologia–Centro Interventistico, Ospedale S. Maria delle Croci, Ravenna (M.B., A. Maresta); Unità Operativa di Cardiologia, Ospedale degli Infermi, Rimini (G.P.); Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale Maggiore, Parma (A. Menozzi); Unità Operativa di Cardiologia Interventistica, Ospedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia (V.G.); Divisione di Cardiologia,...

Abstract

Background— The long-term effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DES) in unselected diabetics in routine practice is currently unclear. Methods and Results— To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of bare metal stents and DES in a real-world setting of diabetic patients, we analyzed 2-year follow-up data from all diabetic patients with de novo lesions enrolled in a prospective Web-based multicenter registry (Registro Regionale Angioplastiche dell’Emilia-Romagna; study period, 2002 to 2004) comprising all 13 hospitals performing percutaneous coronary interventions in the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy. Among the 1648 eligible patients treated with either bare metal stents alone (n=1089) or DES alone (n=559), 27% were insulin dependent and 83% had multivessel coronary disease. At 2 years, use of DES was associated with lower crude incidence of major adverse cardiac advents (all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) compared with bare metal stents (22.5% versus 28.1%; P =0.01). After propensity score adjustment, only target vessel revascularization appeared significantly lower in the DES group (11.6% versus 15.0%; hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.96; P =0.041). Two-year angiographic stent thrombosis occurred in 1.5% DES patients and 0.7% of the bare-metal-stents patients ( P =0.18). At Cox regression analysis, predictors of 2-year major adverse cardiac advents were left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, Charlson comorbidity index, insulin-dependent diabetes, and total lesion length. Conclusions— In this large, real-world, diabetic population, the use of DES was associated with a moderate reduction in the 2-year risk of target vessel revascularization, a benefit that was limited to non–insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Larger long-term studies are needed to clarify the long-term effectiveness and safety of such devices in diabetic patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3