Relationship Between 24-Hour Ambulatory Central Systolic Blood Pressure and Left Ventricular Mass

Author:

Weber Thomas1,Wassertheurer Siegfried1,Schmidt-Trucksäss Arno1,Rodilla Enrique1,Ablasser Cornelia1,Jankowski Piotr1,Lorenza Muiesan Maria1,Giannattasio Cristina1,Mang Claudia1,Wilkinson Ian1,Kellermair Jörg1,Hametner Bernhard1,Pascual Jose Maria1,Zweiker Robert1,Czarnecka Danuta1,Paini Anna1,Salvetti Massimo1,Maloberti Alessandro1,McEniery Carmel1

Affiliation:

1. From the Cardiology Department, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Austria (T.W.); Center for Health & Bioresources, Department of Health and Environment, Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna (S.W., B.H.); Division Sport and Exercise Medicine, Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Switzerland (A.S.-T.); Department of Medicina Interna, Hospital de Sagunto, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain (E.R., J.M.P.); Cardiology Department, Medical...

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between left ventricular mass and brachial office as well as brachial and central ambulatory systolic blood pressure in 7 European centers. Central systolic pressure was measured with a validated oscillometric device, using a transfer function, and mean/diastolic pressure calibration. M-mode images were obtained by echocardiography, and left ventricular mass was determined by one single reader blinded to blood pressure. We studied 289 participants (137 women) free from antihypertensive drugs (mean age: 50.8 years). Mean office blood pressure was 145/88 mm Hg and mean brachial and central ambulatory systolic pressures were 127 and 128 mm Hg, respectively. Mean left ventricular mass was 93.3 kg/m 2 , and 25.6% had left ventricular hypertrophy. The correlation coefficient between left ventricular mass and brachial office, brachial ambulatory, and central ambulatory systolic pressure was 0.29, 0.41, and 0.47, respectively ( P =0.003 for comparison between brachial office and central ambulatory systolic pressure and 0.32 for comparison between brachial and central ambulatory systolic pressure). The results were consistent for men and women, and young and old participants. The areas under the curve for prediction of left ventricular hypertrophy were 0.618, 0.635, and 0.666 for brachial office, brachial, and central ambulatory systolic pressure, respectively ( P =0.03 for comparison between brachial and central ambulatory systolic pressure). In younger participants, central ambulatory systolic pressure was superior to both other measurements. Central ambulatory systolic pressure, measured with an oscillometric cuff, shows a strong trend toward a closer association with left ventricular mass and hypertrophy than brachial office/ambulatory systolic pressure. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01278732.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3