Sex Differences in Blood Pressure and Potential Implications for Cardiovascular Risk Management

Author:

Picone Dean S.1ORCID,Stoneman Elif1,Cremer Antoine2,Schultz Martin G.1,Otahal Petr1,Hughes Alun D.3ORCID,Black J. Andrew14,Bos Willem Jan56ORCID,Chen Chen-Huan7,Cheng Hao-Min89101112ORCID,Dwyer Nathan14,Lacy Peter13ORCID,Laugesen Esben14ORCID,Liang Fuyou1516ORCID,Kim Hack-Lyoung17ORCID,Ohte Nobuyuki18,Okada Sho19,Omboni Stefano2021,Ott Christian22,Pereira Telmo2324ORCID,Pucci Giacomo25ORCID,Rajani Ronak26,Schmieder Roland22ORCID,Sinha Manish D.27ORCID,Stewart Ralph28ORCID,Stouffer George A.29ORCID,Takazawa Kenji30ORCID,Wang Jiguang31ORCID,Weber Thomas32ORCID,Westerhof Berend E.33ORCID,Williams Bryan13ORCID,Yamada Hirotsugu34,Sharman James E.ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia (D.S.P., E.S., M.G.S., P.O., J.A.B., N.D.).

2. Department of Cardiology/Hypertension, University Hospital of Bordeaux, France (A.C.).

3. MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom (A.D.H.).

4. Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia (J.A.B., N.D.).

5. Department of Internal Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands (W.J.B.).

6. Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (W.J.B.).

7. Department of Internal Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University College of Medicine (C.-H.C.).

8. Department of Medicine (H.-M.C.), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.

9. Institute of Public Health (H.-M.C.), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.

10. Center for Evidence-based Medicine (H.-M.C.), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.

11. Department of Medical Education (H.-M.C.), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.

12. Institute of Health and Welfare Policy, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan (H.-M.C.).

13. Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University College London (UCL) and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) UCL/UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom (P.L., B.W.).

14. Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark (E.L.).

15. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China (F.L.).

16. World-Class Research Center “Digital biodesign and personalized healthcare”, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Russia (F.L.).

17. Division of Cardiology, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (H.-L.K.).

18. Department of Cardio-Renal Medicine and Hypertension, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Japan (N.O.).

19. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan (S.O.).

20. Clinical Research Unit, Italian Institute of Telemedicine, Varese, Italy (S.O.).

21. Department of Cardiology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Russian Federation (S.O.).

22. Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany (C.O., R.S.).

23. Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra Health School, Coimbra, Portugal (T.P.).

24. Laboratory for Applied Health Research (LabinSaúde), Coimbra, Portugal (T.P.).

25. Unit of Internal Medicine at Terni University Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Italy (G.P.).

26. Cardiology Department, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospitals, London, United Kingdom (R.R.).

27. Kings College London British Heart Foundation Centre and Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Evelina London Children’s Hospital, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom (M.D.S).

28. Green Lane Cardiovascular Service, Auckland City Hospital, University of Auckland, New Zealand (R.S.).

29. Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (G.A.S).

30. Center for Health Surveillance and Preventive Medicine, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Japan (K.T.).

31. Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Department of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China (J.W.).

32. Cardiology Department, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Austria (T.W.).

33. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, The Netherlands (B.E.W.).

34. Department of Community Medicine for Cardiology, Tokushima Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Japan (H.Y.).

Abstract

Background: Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement is critical for optimal cardiovascular risk management. Age-related trajectories for cuff-measured BP accelerate faster in women compared with men, but whether cuff BP represents the intraarterial (invasive) aortic BP is unknown. This study aimed to determine the sex differences between cuff BP, invasive aortic BP, and the difference between the 2 measurements. Methods: Upper-arm cuff BP and invasive aortic BP were measured during coronary angiography in 1615 subjects from the Invasive Blood Pressure Consortium Database. This analysis comprised 22 different cuff BP devices from 28 studies. Results: Subjects were 64±11 years (range 40–89) and 32% women. For the same cuff systolic BP (SBP), invasive aortic SBP was 4.4 mm Hg higher in women compared with men. Cuff and invasive aortic SBP were higher in women compared with men, but the sex difference was more pronounced from invasive aortic SBP, was the lowest in younger ages, and the highest in older ages. Cuff diastolic blood pressure overestimated invasive diastolic blood pressure in both sexes. For cuff and invasive diastolic blood pressure separately, there were sex*age interactions in which diastolic blood pressure was higher in younger men and lower in older men, compared with women. Cuff pulse pressure underestimated invasive aortic pulse pressure in excess of 10 mm Hg for both sexes in older age. Conclusions: For the same cuff SBP, invasive aortic SBP was higher in women compared with men. How this translates to cardiovascular risk prediction needs to be determined, but women may be at higher BP-related risk than estimated by cuff measurements.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3