Long‐Term Follow‐up of the PADI Trial: Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Versus Drug‐Eluting Stents for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Critical Limb Ischemia

Author:

Spreen Marlon I.1,Martens Jasper M.1,Knippenberg Bob2,van Dijk Lukas C.1,de Vries Jean‐Paul P. M.3,Vos Jan Albert4,de Borst Gert Jan5,Vonken Evert‐Jan P. A.6,Bijlstra Okker D.7,Wever Jan J.2,Statius van Eps Randolph G.2,Mali Willem P. Th. M.6,van Overhagen Hendrik1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands

2. Department of Vascular Surgery, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands

3. Department of Vascular Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands

4. Department of Radiology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands

5. Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

6. Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

7. Faculty of Medicine, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background Clinical outcomes reported after treatment of infrapopliteal lesions with drug‐eluting stents (DESs) have been more favorable compared with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with a bailout bare metal stent ( PTABMS ) through midterm follow‐up in patients with critical limb ischemia. In the present study, long‐term results of treatment of infrapopliteal lesions with DESs are presented. Methods and Results Adults with critical limb ischemia (Rutherford category ≥4) and infrapopliteal lesions were randomized to receive PTABMS or DESs with paclitaxel. Long‐term follow‐up consisted of annual assessments up to 5 years after treatment or until a clinical end point was reached. Clinical end points were major amputation (above ankle level), infrapopliteal surgical or endovascular reintervention, and death. Preserved primary patency (≤50% restenosis) of treated lesions was an additional morphological end point, assessed by duplex sonography. In total, 74 limbs (73 patients) were treated with DESs and 66 limbs (64 patients) were treated with PTABMS . The estimated 5‐year major amputation rate was lower in the DES arm (19.3% versus 34.0% for PTABMS ; P =0.091). The 5‐year rates of amputation‐ and event‐free survival (survival free from major amputation or reintervention) were significantly higher in the DES arm compared with PTA ‐BMS (31.8% versus 20.4%, P =0.043; and 26.2% versus 15.3%, P =0.041, respectively). Survival rates were comparable. The limited available morphological results showed higher preserved patency rates after DESs than after PTABMS at 1, 3, and 4 years of follow‐up. Conclusions Both clinical and morphological long‐term results after treatment of infrapopliteal lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia are improved with DES compared with PTABMS . Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 00471289.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3