Impact of Clinical Trial Results on the Temporal Trends of Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting From 2002 to 2014

Author:

Hussain Mohamad A.1,Mamdani Muhammad1,Tu Jack V.1,Saposnik Gustavo1,Khoushhal Zeyad1,Aljabri Badr1,Verma Subdoh1,Al-Omran Mohammed1

Affiliation:

1. From the Divisions of Vascular Surgery (M.A.H., Z.K., B.A., M.A.-O.), Neurology (G.S.), and Cardiac Surgery (S.V.) and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital (M.M., G.S., S.V., M.A.-O.), Toronto, Canada; Departments of Surgery (M.A.H., S.V., M.A.-O.) and Medicine (J.V.T., G.S.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (M.M., J.V.T., G.S.) and Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (M.M.), University of Toronto, Canada; King Saud...

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Randomized trials provide conflicting data for the efficacy of carotid-artery stenting compared with endarterectomy. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of conflicting clinical trial publications on the utilization rates of carotid revascularization procedures. Methods— We conducted a population-level time-series analysis of all individuals who underwent carotid endarterectomy and stenting in Ontario, Canada (2002–2014). The primary analysis examined temporal changes in the rates of carotid revascularization procedures after publications of major randomized trials. Secondary analyses examined changes in overall and age, sex, carotid-artery symptom, and operator specialty–specific procedure rates. Results— A total of 16 772 patients were studied (14 394 endarterectomy [86%]; 2378 stenting [14%]). The overall rate of carotid revascularization decreased from 6.0 procedures per 100 000 individuals ≥40 years old in April 2002 to 4.3 procedures in the first quarter of 2014 (29% decrease; P <0.001). The rate of endarterectomy decreased by 36% ( P <0.001), whereas the rate of carotid-artery stenting increased by 72% ( P =0.006). We observed a marked increase ( P =0.01) in stenting after publication of the SAPPHIRE trial (Stenting and Angioplasty With Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy) in 2004, whereas stenting remained relatively unchanged after subsequent randomized trials published in 2006 ( P =0.11) and 2010 ( P =0.34). In contrast, endarterectomy decreased after trials published in 2006 ( P =0.04) and 2010 ( P =0.005). Conclusions— Although the overall rates of carotid revascularization and endarterectomy have fallen since 2002, the rate of carotid-artery stenting has risen since the publication of stenting-favorable SAPPHIRE trial. Subsequent conflicting randomized trials were associated with a decreasing rate of carotid endarterectomy.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3