Antithrombotic Treatment of Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source

Author:

Diener Hans-Christoph1ORCID,Sacco Ralph L.2,Easton J. Donald3,Granger Christopher B.4,Bar Michal5,Bernstein Richard A.6,Brainin Michael7,Brueckmann Martina89,Cronin Lisa10,Donnan Geoffrey11,Gdovinová Zuzana12,Grauer Claudia13,Kleine Eva14,Kleinig Timothy J.15,Lyrer Philippe16,Martins Sheila17,Meyerhoff Juliane18,Milling Truman19,Pfeilschifter Waltraud20,Poli Sven21,Reif Michal22,Rose David Z.23,Šaňák Daniel24,Schäbitz Wolf-Rüdiger25

Affiliation:

1. From the Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany (H.-C.D.)

2. Clinical and Translational Science, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, FL (R.L.S.)

3. Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco (J.D.E.)

4. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (C.B.G.)

5. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba-Poruba, Czech Republic (M. Bar)

6. Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (R.A.B.)

7. Department of Neurosciences and Preventive Medicine, Danube University Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria (M. Brainin)

8. Metabolism Medicine, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Germany (M. Brueckmann)

9. Faculty of Medicine Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Germany (M. Brueckmann)

10. Cardiometabolic Medicine, Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd, Burlington, ON, Canada (L.C.)

11. Department of Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia (G.D.)

12. Department of Neurology, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, University Hospital L. Pasteur, Košice, Slovak Republic (Z.G.)

13. Clinical Operations Global, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. K.G., Biberach, Germany (C.G.)

14. Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. K.G., Ingelheim, Germany (E.K.)

15. Department of Neurology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia (T.J.K.)

16. Division of Neurology, Stroke Center, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland (P.L.)

17. Neurology Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil (S.M.)

18. Cardiology Medicine, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Germany (J.M.)

19. Department of Neurology, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Seton Dell Medical School Stroke Institute, Austin, TX (T.M.)

20. Center of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (W.P.)

21. Department of Neurology with Focus on Neurovascular Diseases and Neurooncology, University of Tübingen, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Germany (S.P.)

22. Department of Neurology, Cerebrovaskulární ambulance s.r.o., Brno, Czech Republic (M.R.)

23. Department of Neurology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa (D.Z.R.)

24. Comprehensive Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic (D.S.)

25. Department of Neurology, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany (W.-R.S.).

Abstract

Background and Purpose— The RE-SPECT ESUS trial (Randomized, Double-Blind, Evaluation in Secondary Stroke Prevention Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Etexilate Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) tested the hypothesis that dabigatran would be superior to aspirin for the prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. This exploratory subgroup analysis investigates the impact of age, renal function (both predefined), and dabigatran dose (post hoc) on the rates of recurrent stroke and major bleeding. Methods— RE-SPECT ESUS was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of dabigatran 150 or 110 mg (for patients aged ≥75 years and/or with creatinine clearance 30 to <50 mL/minute) twice daily compared with aspirin 100 mg once daily. The primary outcome was recurrent stroke. Results— The trial, which enrolled 5390 patients from December 2014 to January 2018, did not demonstrate superiority of dabigatran versus aspirin for prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. However, among the population qualifying for the lower dabigatran dose, the rate of recurrent stroke was reduced with dabigatran versus aspirin (7.4% versus 13.0%; hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.39–0.82]; interaction P =0.01). This was driven mainly by the subgroup aged ≥75 years (7.8% versus 12.4%; hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.43–0.94]; interaction P =0.10). Stroke rates tended to be lower with dabigatran versus aspirin with declining renal function. Risks for major bleeding were similar between treatments, irrespective of renal function, but with a trend for lower bleeding rates with dabigatran versus aspirin in older patients. Conclusions— In subgroup analyses of RE-SPECT ESUS, dabigatran reduced the rate of recurrent stroke compared with aspirin in patients qualifying for the lower dose of dabigatran. These results are hypothesis-generating. Aspirin remains the standard antithrombotic treatment for patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02239120.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3