Prognostic implications of diagnostic Q waves after myocardial infarction.

Author:

Wasserman A G,Bren G B,Ross A M,Richardson D W,Hutchinson R G,Rios J C

Abstract

The long-term prognostic implications of the electrocardiographic location of a myocardial infarction and the subsequent retention or disappearance of diagnostic Q waves were examined in patients enrolled in the Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study (AMIS). The 4524 participants, ages 30-69 years, had sustained a myocardial infarction 8 weeks to 60 months before randomization to aspirin and placebo groups. Subjects were followed for at least 3 years (average 38.2 months). Using the Minnesota Code, myocardial infarctions were classified according to three electrocardiographic locations: lateral, inferior and anterior, with further subdivision into major, moderate and minor criteria based on Q-wave duration and Q/R rations. Total mortality was not significantly different among patients with single infarct sites: lateral 11.8%, inferior 8.0% and anterior 9.4%. Patients with multiple electrocardiographic infarct locations had a significantly higher mortality (14.6%, p less than 0.0002). Participants with Minnesota Code major criteria of infarction also had a significantly higher mortality (10.6%) than those with moderate (7.2%) or minor (7.4%) criteria (p less than 0.01). Loss of a previously documented diagnostic Q wave occurred in 14.2% of participants. Mortality among patients who lost Q waves (6.5%) was not significantly different from that among those with persistent Q waves in a single infarct location (8.7%). No long-term prognostic significance can be attributed to the site of infarction or loss of Q wave on the resting ECG. However, major Q-wave criteria and extent of infarction based on multiple coded sites are associated with a higher 3-year mortality.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference20 articles.

Cited by 46 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3