Human Leukocyte Antigen‐Based Risk Stratification in Heart Transplant Recipients—Implications for Targeted Surveillance

Author:

Nilsson Johan1,Ansari David1,Ohlsson Mattias2,Höglund Peter3,Liedberg Ann‐Sofie4,Smith J. Gustav5,Nugues Pierre6,Andersson Bodil7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Sciences Lund Cardiothoracic Surgery Lund University and Skane University Hospital Lund Sweden

2. Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Computational Biology and Biological Physics Lund University Lund Sweden

3. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology Lund University and Office for Medical Services Lund Sweden

4. Department of Laboratory Medicine Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Lund University and Office for Medical Services Lund Sweden

5. Department of Clinical Sciences Lund Cardiology Lund University and Skane University Hospital Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine and Lund University Diabetes Center Lund University Lund Sweden

6. Department of Computer Science Lund University Lund Sweden

7. Department of Clinical Sciences Lund Surgery Lund University and Skane University Hospital Lund Sweden

Abstract

Background Human leukocyte antigen ( HLA ) matching isn't routinely performed in heart transplantation. Novel allograft perfusion methods may make HLA matching feasible. The purpose of this study is to reexamine whether HLA mismatch may be used in risk stratification to improve outcomes in heart transplantation. Methods and Results We analyzed 34 681 recipients undergoing heart transplantation between 1987 and 2013. We used HLAM atchmaker to quantify HLA eplet mismatches and Cox regression for analysis of time to graft loss. Recipients with 4 mismatched HLADR / DQ alleles and >40 eplets reached an adjusted hazard ratio ( HR) for graft loss of 1.17 (95% CI 1.07–1.28) and 1.11 (95% CI 1.03–1.21), respectively. We found significant interaction between recipient age and numbers of HLADR / DQ allele and eplet mismatches resulting in an adjusted HR of 1.78 (95% 1.13–2.80) and 1.82 (95% CI , 1.23–2.70), respectively. HR for both interaction terms was 0.99 (95% CI , 0.98–1.00). Risk of graft loss was more pronounced after 1 year, where recipient <40 years with 4 mismatched HLADR / DQ alleles and >40 eplets had an adjusted HR of 1.51 (95% CI 1.12–2.03) and 1.32 (95% CI 1.02–1.70), respectively. Pre‐sensitized recipients with panel reactive antibodies >10% had an adjusted HR =1.27 (95% CI 1.16–1.40) for graft loss within 1 year but not thereafter. HLA eplet mismatch was independent of panel reactive antibodies on reduction of graft loss within and after 1 year, P (interaction)=0.888 and 0.389. Conclusions HLA mismatch may be used in risk stratification for intensified post‐transplant surveillance and therapy.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3