Need for Better and Broader Training in Cardio‐Obstetrics: A National Survey of Cardiologists, Cardiovascular Team Members, and Cardiology Fellows in Training

Author:

Bello Natalie A.1ORCID,Agrawal Akanksha2,Davis Melinda B.3ORCID,Harrington Colleen M.4ORCID,Lindley Kathryn J.5ORCID,Minissian Margo B.6,Sharma Garima7ORCID,Walsh Mary Norine8,Park Ki9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology Smidt Heart Institute Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles CA

2. Emory Heart and Vascular Center Emory Women’s Heart Center Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA

3. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI

4. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Department of Medicine University of Massachusetts School of Medicine Worcester MA

5. Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine Washington University in St Louis MO

6. Barbra Streisand Women’s Heart Center Cedars‐Sinai Smidt Heart Institute and the Geri and Richard Brawerman Nursing Institute Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles CA

7. Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD

8. Division of Cardiology St. Vincent Heart Center Indianapolis IN

9. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine Gainesville FL

Abstract

Background Team‐based models of cardio‐obstetrics care have been developed to address the increasing rate of maternal mortality from cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovascular clinician and trainee knowledge and comfort with this topic, and the extent of implementation of an interdisciplinary approach to cardio‐obstetrics, are unknown. Methods and Results We aimed to assess the current state of cardio‐obstetrics knowledge, practices, and services provided by US cardiovascular clinicians and trainees. A survey developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology was circulated to a representative sample of cardiologists (N=311), cardiovascular team members (N=51), and fellows in training (N=139) from June 18, 2020, to July 29, 2020. Knowledge and attitudes about the provision of cardiovascular care to pregnant patients and the prevalence and composition of cardio‐obstetrics teams were assessed. The widest knowledge gaps on the care of pregnant compared with nonpregnant patients were reported for medication safety (42%), acute coronary syndromes (39%), aortopathies (40%), and valvular heart disease (30%). Most respondents (76%) lack access to a dedicated cardio‐obstetrics team, and only 29% of practicing cardiologists received cardio‐obstetrics didactics during training. One third of fellows in training reported seeing pregnant women 0 to 1 time per year, and 12% of fellows in training report formal training in cardio‐obstetrics. Conclusions Formalized training in cardio‐obstetrics is uncommon, and limited access to multidisciplinary cardio‐obstetrics teams and large knowledge gaps exist among cardiovascular clinicians. Augmentation of cardio‐obstetrics education across career stages is needed to reduce these deficits. These survey results are an initial step toward developing a standard expectation for clinicians’ training in cardio‐obstetrics.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. D'Oria R Downs K Trierweiler K. Report from maternal mortality review committees: a view into their critical role. 2017. Available at: https://www.cdcfoundation.org/sites/default/files/upload/pdf/MMRIAReport.pdf. Accessed 9/5/2020 2020.

2. Vital Signs: Pregnancy-Related Deaths, United States, 2011–2015, and Strategies for Prevention, 13 States, 2013–2017

3. Pregnancy-Related Mortality in the United States, 2011–2013

4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Trends in pregnancy‐related mortality in the United States: 1987–2016. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternal‐mortality/pregnancy‐mortality‐surveillance‐system.htm#trends. Accessed September 5 2020.

5. Office of the Surgeon General (OSG) . The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Improve Maternal Health [Internet]. US Department of Health and Human Services; 2020. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/call‐to‐action‐maternal‐health.pdf. Accessed June 30 2021.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3