Affiliation:
1. Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine University of Tartu Estonia
2. Women's Clinic Tartu University Hospital Tartu Estonia
3. Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Tartu Estonia
4. Departments of Medicine, Pharmacology and Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN
Abstract
Background
Recurrent pregnancy loss affects 1% to 2% of couples attempting childbirth. A large fraction of all cases remains idiopathic, which warrants research into monogenic causes of this distressing disorder.
Methods and Results
We investigated a nonconsanguineous Estonian family who had experienced 5 live births, intersected by 3 early pregnancy losses, and 6 fetal deaths, 3 of which occurred during the second trimester. No fetal malformations were described at the autopsies performed in 3 of 6 cases of fetal death. Parental and fetal chromosomal abnormalities (including submicroscopic) and maternal risk factors were excluded. Material for genetic testing was available from 4 miscarried cases (gestational weeks 11, 14, 17, and 18). Exome sequencing in 3 pregnancy losses and the mother identified no rare variants explicitly shared by the miscarried conceptuses. However, the mother and 2 pregnancy losses carried a heterozygous nonsynonymous variant, resulting in p.Val173Asp (
rs199472695
) in the ion channel gene
KCNQ1
. It is expressed not only in heart, where mutations cause type 1 long‐QT syndrome, but also in other tissues, including uterus. The p.Val173Asp variant has been previously identified in a patient with type 1 long‐QT syndrome, but not reported in the Genome Aggregation Database. With heterologous expression in CHO cells, our in vitro electrophysiologic studies indicated that the mutant slowly activating voltage‐gated K+ channel (
I
Ks
) is dysfunctional. It showed reduced total activating and deactivating currents (
P
<0.01), with dramatically positive shift of voltage dependence of activation by ≈10 mV (
P
<0.05).
Conclusions
The current study uncovered concealed maternal type 1 long‐QT syndrome as a potential novel cause behind recurrent fetal loss.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Reference65 articles.
1. Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion;Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address asrm@asrm.org;Fertil Steril,2020
2. Eshre guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss;Bender Atik R;Hum Reprod Open,2018
3. Kasak L, Rull K, Laan M. Genetics and genomics of recurrent pregnancy loss. In: Leung P, Qiao J, eds. Human Reproductive and Prenatal Genetics. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press Inc; 2019:463–494. DOI: 10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐813570‐9.00021‐8.
4. Family history and risk of miscarriage: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies;Woolner AMF;Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2020
5. Genetics of recurrent miscarriage: challenges, current knowledge, future directions;Rull K;Front Genet,2012
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献