Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Women Versus Men

Author:

Zusterzeel Robbert1,Spatz Erica S.1,Curtis Jeptha P.1,Sanders William E.1,Selzman Kimberly A.1,Piña Ileana L.1,Bao Haikun1,Ponirakis Angelo1,Varosy Paul D.1,Masoudi Frederick A.1,Caños Daniel A.1,Strauss David G.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD (R.Z., W.E.S., K.A.S., I.L.P., D.A.C., D.G.S.); Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (E.S.S., J.P.C., H.B.); American College of Cardiology Foundation, Washington, DC (A.P.); VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, University of Colorado, Denver (P.D.V.); Colorado Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Group, Denver (P.D.V.); and University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (F.A.M.).

Abstract

Background— Women have been under-represented in trials of cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (CRT-D). Previous studies suggest that women benefit from CRT-D at shorter QRS duration than men and that there may be no benefit of CRT-D in patients without left bundle branch block (LBBB) regardless of patient sex. Methods and Results— We compared sex-specific death risk in 75 079 patients with New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and prolonged QRS duration (≥120 ms) receiving either CRT-D or implantable cardioverter defibrillator in subgroups according to QRS morphology and 10-ms increments in QRS duration. We applied propensity score weighting to control for differences between treatments. Among patients with LBBB, women receiving CRT-D had a lower relative death risk than those receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (absolute difference, 11%; hazard ratio=0.74 [95% confidence interval, 0.68–0.81]). In men, the lower mortality with CRT-D versus implantable cardioverter defibrillator was less pronounced (absolute difference, 9%; hazard ratio=0.84 [0.79–0.89]; sex×device interaction P =0.025). In those without LBBB, the mortality difference was modest and did not differ between women and men (absolute difference, 3%; hazard ratio=0.88 [0.79–0.97] in women and absolute difference, 2%; hazard ratio=0.95 [0.91–0.998] in men; interaction P =0.17). In subgroups according to QRS duration, CRT-D was associated with better survival in both sexes with LBBB and QRS ≥130 ms, whereas there was no clear relation between QRS duration and survival in patients without LBBB regardless of patient sex. Conclusions— In a large real-world population CRT-D was associated with a lower mortality risk in both sexes with LBBB, although more pronounced among women. Only among those with LBBB, both sexes had better survival with longer QRS duration. The mortality differences in patients without LBBB were attenuated in both sexes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 62 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3