Affiliation:
1. From the Mid-America Heart Institute and University of Missouri (P.S.C., J.A.S.), Kansas City, Mo; The VA Ann Arbor Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence and the University of Michigan Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (B.K.N.), Ann Arbor, Mich; Division of Cardiology (F.A.M.), Denver Health Medical Center and the University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colo; and The Lindner Clinical Trial Center at the Christ Hospital and the Ohio Heart and...
Abstract
Background—
Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in primary prevention patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, recent studies have questioned their overall role in clinical practice, especially in older patients and those with major comorbid conditions.
Methods and Results—
In a prospective cohort of 965 patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies (ejection fraction ≤35%) and no prior ventricular arrhythmias, we compared long-term mortality in patients who did (n=494 [51%]) and did not receive ICDs over a mean follow-up period of 34�16 months. Using a landmark analysis, multivariable Cox proportional hazards models that included propensity scores for ICD implantation assessed the relationship between ICD therapy and mortality in the entire cohort and by age and the presence of major comorbid conditions. Data from these analyses were then used as inputs in a Markov model to generate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for ICD therapy. Patients who received ICDs were similar in age and prevalence of most major comorbid conditions, including symptomatic heart failure. After multivariable adjustment, ICD therapy was associated with a 31% lower risk for all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.96;
P
=0.03). The relationship between ICD therapy and lower all-cause mortality was consistent after stratification by age (<65, 65 to 74, and ≥75), ischemic etiology, ejection fraction (>25% versus ≤25%), and the presence of major comorbid conditions (probability values for all interactions >0.05). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for ICD therapy were similar between patients aged ≥75 years and younger patients but rose slightly in those with multiple comorbid conditions.
Conclusions—
Routine use of ICDs in primary prevention patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction was associated with lower all-cause mortality, even among older patients and those with major comorbid conditions. Although their use needs to be individualized, our findings suggest that these groups should not be routinely excluded from ICD treatment.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cited by
88 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献