Performance of the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure Score in Black Patients Compared With Whites

Author:

Radjef Ryhm1,Peterson Edward L.2,Michaels Alexander1,Liu Bin2,Gui Hongsheng3,Sabbah Hani N.1,Spertus John A.4,Williams L. Keoki3,Lanfear David E.13

Affiliation:

1. Heart and Vascular Institute (R.R., A.M., H.N.S., D.E.L.), Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.

2. Department of Public Health Sciences (E.L.P., B.L.), Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.

3. Center for Individualized and Genomic Medicine Research, (H.G., L.K.W., D.E.L.), Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.

4. Mid America Heart Institute, St. Luke’s Hospital, Kansas City, MO (J.A.S.).

Abstract

Background: Risk stratification is critical in heart failure (HF) and the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic HF (MAGGIC) score is a validated tool derived from ~40,000 patients. However, few of these patients self-identified as black, raising uncertainty regarding performance in blacks with HF. Methods and Results: This study analyzed a racially diverse group of 4046 patients (1646 black and 2400 white) from a single center from 2007 to 2015. Baseline characteristics were collected to tabulate MAGGIC score and test its discrimination and calibration within race groups. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Death was detected using system records and the social security death master file. Discrimination was tested using Cox models of MAGGIC score stratified by race, and combined analysis including MAGGIC, race, and MAGGIC×race. Calibration was assessed using linear regression models and plots of observed versus predicted data. Overall, 901 (21%) patients died during 1-year follow-up. MAGGIC score discrimination was similar in both race groups in terms of C statistic (0.707±0.027 versus 0.725±0.014, for black versus white; P =0.556) and the hazard ratio (HR) per MAGGIC point was 1.12 in black patients (95% CI, 1.10–1.14) and 1.13 in white patients (95% CI, 1.12–1.14). Race was a significant correlate of survival, with better survival in black patients compared with white (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56–0.78), but the interaction of MAGGIC×race was not significant (β=−0.013; P =0.16), and adding race to the model did not improve discrimination (C statistic for MAGGIC versus MAGGIC+race, 0.721 versus 0.722; P =0.79). In calibration testing, the slope was not significantly different from 1 in either group, but the groups differed from each other, and it was closer to unity among black patients (0.94 versus 1.4; P =0.004). Conclusions: These data support the use of the MAGGIC score to risk stratify black patients with HF.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3