Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Fibrosis Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Author:

Bisbal Felipe12ORCID,Benito Eva3,Teis Albert1,Alarcón Francisco3,Sarrias Axel1,Caixal Gala3,Villuendas Roger1ORCID,Garre Paz3ORCID,Soto Nina1ORCID,Cozzari Jennifer3,Guasch Eduard34ORCID,Juncà Gladys1ORCID,Prat-Gonzalez Susanna3,Perea Rosario J.3,Bazán Victor1,Tolosana José María3,Arbelo Elena3ORCID,Bayés-Genís Antoni12ORCID,Mont Lluis234ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Heart Institute (iCor), University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Catalonia (F.B., A.T., A.S., R.V., N.S., G.J., V.B., A.B.-G.).

2. CIBERCV, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid (F.B., A.B.-G., L.M.).

3. Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Spain (E.B., F.A., G.C., P.G., J.C., E.G., S.P.-G., R.J.P., J.M.T., E.A., L.M.).

4. Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain (E.G, L.M.).

Abstract

Background: Myocardial fibrosis is key for atrial fibrillation maintenance. We aimed to test the efficacy of ablating cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-detected atrial fibrosis plus pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods: This was an open-label, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial. Patients with symptomatic drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal and persistent) undergoing first or repeat ablation were randomized in a 1:1 basis to receive PVI plus CMR-guided fibrosis ablation (CMR group) or PVI alone (PVI-alone group). The primary end point was the rate of recurrence (>30 seconds) at 12 months of follow-up using a 12-lead ECG and Holter monitoring at 3, 6, and 12 months. The analysis was conducted by intention-to-treat. Results: In total, 155 patients (71% male, age 59±10, CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 1.3±1.1, 54% paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) were allocated to the PVI-alone group (N=76) or CMR group (N=79). First ablation was performed in 80% and 71% of patients in the PVI-alone and CMR groups, respectively. The mean atrial fibrosis burden was 12% (only ≈50% of patients had fibrosis outside the pulmonary vein area). One hundred percent and 99% of patients received the assigned intervention in the PVI-alone and CMR group, respectively. The primary outcome was achieved in 21 patients (27.6%) in the PVI-alone group and 22 patients (27.8%) in the CMR group (odds ratio: 1.01 [95% CI, 0.50–2.04]; P =0.976). There were no differences in the rate of adverse events (3 in the CMR group and 2 in the PVI-alone group; P =0.68). Conclusions: A pragmatic ablation approach targeting CMR-detected atrial fibrosis plus PVI was not more effective than PVI alone in an unselected population undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation with low fibrosis burden. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02698631.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 43 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3