Association Between Hospital Policy on Local Versus General Anesthesia, and Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy

Author:

Kirchhoff Felix1,Knappich Christoph1,Kallmayer Michael1,Bohmann Bianca1,Lohe Vanessa1,Tsantilas Pavlos2,Naher Shamsun1,Eckstein Hans‐Henning1,Kuehnl Andreas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Munich Germany

2. Gefäßklinik Dr. Tsantilas Augsburg Germany

Abstract

BACKGROUND Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an established procedure for the treatment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis. However, the type of anesthesia during elective CEA is still under debate. This study analyzes the association between the hospital policy on local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia, and the outcome of elective CEA in German hospitals. METHODS This retrospective analysis is based on the nationwide German statutory carotid quality assurance database for the years 2012 to 2016. Research was funded by Germany's Federal Joint Committee Innovation Fund (funding reference number 01VSF19016). Emergency CEA and carotid stenting procedures were excluded from the analysis. A total of 119 800 patients remained in the analysis. Hospitals were classified on a yearly basis as routine general anesthesia (<10% LA), selective LA (10%–90% LA), or routine LA centers (>90% LA). The primary outcome event was the combined in‐hospital rate of stroke or death. Secondary outcome events were in‐hospital stroke, major stroke or death, death, myocardial infarction, and major adverse cardiovascular events. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to analyze associations between the primary outcome event and the hospital policy on LA versus general anesthesia as well as clinical or procedural variables. RESULTS Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups (age, degree of stenosis, and rate of symptomatic patients). Raw primary outcome event rates were 1.9%, 2.1%, and 1.6% in routine general anesthesia, selective LA, and routine LA centers, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed a significant lower rate of the primary outcome event for CEA operated under LA (adjusted odds ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.33–0.67]; P <0.001). Stratified multivariable analysis revealed that the beneficial effect of LA was only present in routine LA centers. CONCLUSION LA is associated with a lower risk of in‐hospital stroke or death after CEA in centers that use LA routinely.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference29 articles.

1. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015

2. Trends in disease burden in Germany: results, implications and limitations of the Global Burden of Disease study;Plass D;Dtsch Arztebl Int,2014

3. Etiology, risk factors and sex differences in ischemic stroke in the Ludwigshafen stroke study, a population‐based stroke registry;Palm F;Cerebrovasc Dis,2012

4. Epidemiology of ischemic stroke subtypes according to TOAST criteria incidence, recurrence, and long‐term survival in ischemic stroke subtypes: a population‐based study;Kolominsky‐Rabas PL;Stroke,2001

5. Clinical practice guideline: diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up in extracranial carotid stenosis;Eckstein H‐H;Dtsch Aerzteblatt Online,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3