Affiliation:
1. Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
2. Gefäßklinik Dr. Tsantilas Augsburg Germany
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an established procedure for the treatment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis. However, the type of anesthesia during elective CEA is still under debate. This study analyzes the association between the hospital policy on local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia, and the outcome of elective CEA in German hospitals.
METHODS
This retrospective analysis is based on the nationwide German statutory carotid quality assurance database for the years 2012 to 2016. Research was funded by Germany's Federal Joint Committee Innovation Fund (funding reference number 01VSF19016). Emergency CEA and carotid stenting procedures were excluded from the analysis. A total of 119 800 patients remained in the analysis. Hospitals were classified on a yearly basis as routine general anesthesia (<10% LA), selective LA (10%–90% LA), or routine LA centers (>90% LA). The primary outcome event was the combined in‐hospital rate of stroke or death. Secondary outcome events were in‐hospital stroke, major stroke or death, death, myocardial infarction, and major adverse cardiovascular events. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to analyze associations between the primary outcome event and the hospital policy on LA versus general anesthesia as well as clinical or procedural variables.
RESULTS
Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups (age, degree of stenosis, and rate of symptomatic patients). Raw primary outcome event rates were 1.9%, 2.1%, and 1.6% in routine general anesthesia, selective LA, and routine LA centers, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed a significant lower rate of the primary outcome event for CEA operated under LA (adjusted odds ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.33–0.67];
P
<0.001). Stratified multivariable analysis revealed that the beneficial effect of LA was only present in routine LA centers.
CONCLUSION
LA is associated with a lower risk of in‐hospital stroke or death after CEA in centers that use LA routinely.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference29 articles.
1. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015
2. Trends in disease burden in Germany: results, implications and limitations of the Global Burden of Disease study;Plass D;Dtsch Arztebl Int,2014
3. Etiology, risk factors and sex differences in ischemic stroke in the Ludwigshafen stroke study, a population‐based stroke registry;Palm F;Cerebrovasc Dis,2012
4. Epidemiology of ischemic stroke subtypes according to TOAST criteria incidence, recurrence, and long‐term survival in ischemic stroke subtypes: a population‐based study;Kolominsky‐Rabas PL;Stroke,2001
5. Clinical practice guideline: diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up in extracranial carotid stenosis;Eckstein H‐H;Dtsch Aerzteblatt Online,2020