Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Author:

Rusyniak Daniel E.1,Kirk Mark A.1,May Jason D.1,Kao Louise W.1,Brizendine Edward J.1,Welch Julie L.1,Cordell William H.1,Alonso Robert J.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Departments of Emergency Medicine (D.E.R., J.D.M. L.W.K., J.L.W., W.H.C.) and Division of Biostatistics (E.J.B.), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis; Hoosier Neurology, Indianapolis, Ind (R.J.A.); and Division of Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville (M.A.K.).

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) has promise as a treatment for acute stroke. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of using HBO in acute ischemic stroke. Methods— We conducted a randomized, prospective, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot study of 33 patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke who did not receive thrombolytics over a 24-month period. Patients were randomized to treatment for 60 minutes in a monoplace hyperbaric chamber pressurized with 100% O 2 to 2.5-atm absolute (ATA) in the HBO group or 1.14 ATA in the sham group. Primary outcomes measured included percentage of patients with improvement at 24 hours (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]) and 90 days (NIHSS, Barthel Index, modified Rankin Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale). Secondary measurements included complications of treatment and mortality at 90 days. Results— Baseline demographics were similar in both groups. There were no differences between the groups at 24 hours ( P =0.44). At 3 months, however, a larger percentage of the sham patients had a good outcome defined by their stroke scores compared with the HBO group (NIHSS, 80% versus 31.3%; P =0.04; Barthel Index, 81.8% versus 50%; P =0.12; modified Rankin Scale, 81.8% versus 31.3%; P =0.02; Glasgow Outcome Scale, 90.9% versus 37.5%; P =0.01) with loss of statistical significance in a intent-to-treat analysis. Conclusions— Although our HBO protocol appears feasible and safe, it does not appear to be beneficial and may be harmful in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3