Failure to augment maximal limb blood flow in response to one-leg versus two-leg exercise in patients with severe heart failure.

Author:

LeJemtel T H,Maskin C S,Lucido D,Chadwick B J

Abstract

Lower limb blood flow, oxygen uptake, and femoral vein O2 content were measured at rest and during maximal bicycle exercise, performed with two legs and one leg, in four normal subjects and in five patients with severe congestive heart failure. While in normal subjects femoral vein blood flow and lower limb vascular conductance were significantly greater during one-leg exercise than during two-leg exercise (6084 +/- 745 vs 5370 +/- 803 ml/min, p less than .05, and 52.3 +/- 8.0 vs 45.1 +/- 8.2 U X 10(3), p less than .05, respectively), in patients with severe congestive heart failure these values were similar during the two forms of exercise (1082 +/- 459 vs 1053 +/- 479 ml/min and 9.6 +/- 3.7 vs 9.4 +/- 3.5 U X 10(3), respectively). In five additional patients, one-leg maximal bicycle exercise was performed before and after administration of phentolamine into the femoral artery of the active leg. Regional alpha-adrenergic blockade with phentolamine did not alter maximal oxygen uptake attained during one-leg bicycle exercise (9.8 +/- 1.5 vs 10.3 +/- 1.9 ml/kg). Lower limb blood flow and femoral vein O2 content attained during maximal one-leg exercise were also similar before and after phentolamine. Thus, in contrast with normal subjects, patients with severe congestive heart failure were unable to further increase limb blood flow during one-leg bicycle exercise. Moreover, local alpha-adrenergic blockade does not augment blood flow to the active limb during maximal one-leg bicycle exercise. This suggests that the ability of the muscular vasculature to vasodilate during exercise is impaired and may be a limiting factor to maximal exercise capacity in such patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 227 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3