Author:
Stasi Alessandro,Thongpravati Onnida
Abstract
The expansion of do-it-yourself (DIY) gene editing, facilitated by Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) technology, has catalyzed a significant shift in scientific research and biotechnology innovation. This movement is propelled by a community-driven approach that challenges the traditional confines of scientific exploration, allowing amateur scientists to perform sophisticated biological experiments. While this democratization fosters inclusivity and accelerates innovation, it simultaneously introduces significant biosecurity risks. The possibility of unregulated gene editing leading to the unintentional creation of harmful organisms or the deliberate engineering of pathogens underscores the need for a new regulatory framework. This paper explores the implications of DIY biology within the context of public health, environmental safety, and biosecurity, highlighting the urgency for adaptive policies that balance scientific freedom with security. It proposes integrating community-driven regulatory practices with formal oversight mechanisms by examining biosecurity implications, ethical considerations, and the potential for misuse. Additionally, the role of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) is explored as a novel approach to transforming governance within the domain of DIY gene editing, particularly in the context of CRISPR research.
Reference41 articles.
1. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity. Strategies to educate amateur biologists and scientists in non-life science disciplines about dual use research in the life sciences [Internet]. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity; 2011. Available from: https://osp.od.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/FinalNSABBReport-AmateurBiologist-NonlifeScientists_June-2011_0.pdf.
2. Guerrini CJ, Spencer GE, Zettler PJ. Diy crispr. NCL Rev. 2018; 97: 1399.
3. Bennett G, Gilman N, Stavrianakis A, Rabinow P. From synthetic biology to biohacking: Are we prepared? Nat Biotechnol. 2009; 27: 1109-1111.
4. Swan M, Hathaway K, Hogg C, McCauley R, Vollrath A. Citizen science genomics as a model for crowdsourced preventive medicine research. J Participat Med. 2010; 2: e20.
5. Wicks P, Vaughan TE, Massagli MP, Heywood J. Accelerated clinical discovery using self-reported patient data collected online and a patient-matching algorithm. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 29: 411-414.