Describing Anisocoria in Neurocritically Ill Patients

Author:

Saju Ciji1,Barnes Arianna2,Kuramatsu Joji B.3,Marshall Jade L.4,Obinata Hirofumi5,Puccio Ava M.6,Yokobori Shoji7,Olson DaiWai M.8,

Affiliation:

1. Ciji Saju is an assistant nurse manager, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

2. Arianna Barnes is a clinical nurse specialist at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St Louis, Missouri.

3. Joji B. Kuramatsu is a professor at University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

4. Jade L. Marshall is a clinical research associate, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.

5. Hirofumi Obinata is a research associate at Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

6. Ava M. Puccio is an associate professor at University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

7. Shoji Yokobori is a professor at Nippon Medical School.

8. DaiWai M. Olson is a professor at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.

Abstract

Background Anisocoria (unequal pupil size) has been defined using cut points ranging from greater than 0.3 mm to greater than 2.0 mm for absolute difference in pupil size. This study explored different pupil diameter cut points for assessing anisocoria as measured by quantitative pupillometry before and after light stimulus. Methods An exploratory descriptive study of international registry data was performed. The first observations in patients with paired left and right quantitative pupillometry measurements were included. Measurements of pupil size before and after stimulus with a fixed light source were used to calculate anisocoria. Results The sample included 5769 patients (mean [SD] age, 57.5 [17.6] years; female sex, 2558 patients [51.5%]; White race, 3669 patients [75.5%]). Anisocoria defined as pupil size difference of greater than 0.5 mm was present in 1624 patients (28.2%) before light stimulus; 645 of these patients (39.7%) also had anisocoria after light stimulus (P < .001). Anisocoria defined as pupil size difference of greater than 2.0 mm was present in 79 patients (1.4%) before light stimulus; 42 of these patients (53.2%) also had anisocoria after light stimulus (P < .001). Discussion The finding of anisocoria significantly differed before and after light stimulus and according to the cut point used. At most cut points, fewer than half of the patients who had anisocoria before light stimulus also had anisocoria after light stimulus. Conclusion The profound difference in the number of patients adjudicated as having anisocoria using different cut points reinforces the need to develop a universal definition for anisocoria.

Publisher

AACN Publishing

Subject

Critical Care Nursing,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3