Increased Role of Open Bibliographic Data in the Context of Restricted Access to Proprietary Information Systems

Author:

Gureev Vadim1ORCID,Mazov Nikolay2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. State Public Scientific Technological Library, Siberian Branch of the RAS; Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russia

2. State Public Scientific Technological Library, Siberian Branch of the RAS; Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch of the RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia

Abstract

The paper presents a review of function capabilities and coverage of sources in open bibliographic databases that can be useful in the limited access to proprietary information systems. Databases were primarily evaluated with regard to their usefulness for researchers and research libraries who solve the problems of information and patent search, bibliometric assessment of authors, promotion of papers in international information space, searching collaborators or conducting bibliometric studies. We focused on multidisciplinary databases covering wide range of international scientific literature. Based on our own experience and literature review, we concluded on possibility in principle to solve almost all information-retrieval and bibliometric tasks using current open bibliographic databases and their web-tools. Furthermore, large volumes of metadata are now regarded as a basic and non-unique feature of different databases, while analytical characteristics are taking centre stage.

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference74 articles.

1. Web of Science Journal Evaluation Process and Selection Criteria. Clarivate. 2023. URL: https://clarivate.com/products/scientific-and-academic-research/research-discovery-and-workflow-solutions/web-of-science/core-collection/editorial-selection-process/editorial-selection-process/ (accessed: 21.04.2023).

2. Content Policy and Selection. Elsevier. 2023. URL: https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/how-scopus-works/content/content-policy-and-selection (accessed: 21.04.2023).

3. Vera-Baceta, M. A., Thelwall, M. and Kousha, K. (2019). Web of Science and Scopus language coverage. Scientometrics. Vol. 121, no. 3. P. 1803–1813. DOI 10.1007/s11192-019-03264-z.

4. Mongeon, P. and Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics. Vol. 106, no. 1. P. 213–228. DOI 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.

5. Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E. and Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison. Scientometrics. Vol. 116, no. 3. P. 2175–2188. DOI 10.1007/s11192-018-2820-9.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3