Improving Concussion Education: Do Athletic Trainers’ Opinions Match Expert Consensus?

Author:

Drattell Julia D.1,Kroshus Emily2,Register-Mihalik Johna K.3,D’Lauro Christopher4,Schmidt Julianne D.1

Affiliation:

1. * UGA Concussion Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens

2. † Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle

3. ‡ Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

4. § Department of Behavioral Sciences and Leadership, United States Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs

Abstract

Context The National Collegiate Athletic Association and Department of Defense (NCAA-DoD) Mind Matters Challenge created “useful and feasible” consensus recommendations to improve concussion care-seeking behavior in collegiate athletes and military cadets. Given athletic trainers’ (ATs’) role as providers of concussion education and medical care, it is important to understand if they agree with the expert panel that the recommendations are useful and feasible. Objective To describe and compare the perceptions of ATs in the secondary school (SS) and collegiate settings of the utility and feasibility of the NCAA-DoD Mind Matters Challenge recommendations on improving concussion education. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Electronic survey. Patients or Other Participants Five hundred fifteen (515) ATs (age = 40.7 ± 12.4 years, 53.1% female gender) practicing in the SS (60.6%) or collegiate (38.4%) setting. Main Outcome Measure(s) An online survey asked participants about their awareness of the statement followed by 17 pairs of Likert-item questions regarding each recommendation’s utility and feasibility with responses ranging from no (1) to yes (9). Mimicking the consensus process, we defined consensus as a mean rating of ≥7.00. We compared utility and feasibility rating responses between SS and collegiate setting participants using Mann-Whitney U tests with α = .05. Results Two-thirds (66.6%) of participants were unaware of the consensus statement. Participants felt all recommendations were useful (all means ≥ 7.0); however, 4 recommendations related to collaborating with stakeholders did not meet the feasibility cutoff (mean range = 6.66–6.84). Secondary school ATs rated lower feasibility related to educational content (P value range = .001–.014), providing patient education throughout recovery (P = .002), and promoting peer intervention (P = .019) but higher utility (P = .007) and feasibility (P = .002) for providing parent education than collegiate ATs. Conclusions The NCAA-DoD Mind Matters Challenge recommendations require further dissemination. Athletic trainers rated collaboration with stakeholders as a feasibility barrier. Secondary school ATs require more resources for educational content, messaging, and promoting peer intervention but find educating athletes’ parents more useful and feasible than collegiate ATs.

Publisher

Journal of Athletic Training/NATA

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3