Affiliation:
1. Petrov National Medical Research Center for Oncology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
2. Petrov National Medical Research Center for Oncology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Saint-Petersburg State University; City Clinical Oncology Hospital No. 1, Department of Health of Moscow
3. Petrov National Medical Research Center for Oncology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Saint-Petersburg State University
Abstract
An increase in the level of prostate-specific antigen requires additional examination of the patient in order not to subject him to unnecessary treatment in case of clinically insignificant prostate cancer and, conversely, to carry out the necessary volume of measures in case of clinically significant prostate cancer. The paper presents the modern solutions for effective usage of diagnostic methods in visualization of clinically significant prostate cancer. To assess the advantages and disadvantages of various methods for diagnosing prostate cancer a search of publications for 2014–2020 period was conducted based on the Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed databases. The request included keywords: prostate cancer, multiparametric MRI, multiparametric ultrasound, PSMA PET/CT. We selected 27 articles. The review includes guidelines from the European Association of Urology, the American Urological Society, the American College of Radiology, and one practice recommendation.
Reference31 articles.
1. Ilic D, Djulbegovic M, Jung JH, Hwang EC, Zhou Q, Cleves A, et al. Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018; 362: k3519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3519
2. Chung DY, Kim MS, Lee JS, Goh HJ, Koh DH, Jang WS, et al. Clinical significance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging as a preoperative predictor of oncologic outcome in very low-risk prostate cancer. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(4): 542. doi: 10.3390/jcm8040542
3. Mottet N, Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, De Santis M, Fanti S, et al. Prostate cancer: EAU Guideline. Available at: https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/ (accessed October 28, 2020).
4. Sanda MG, Chen RC, Crispino T, Freedland S, Greene K, Klotz LH, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline; 2017. Available at: https://www.auanet.org/guidelines/prostate-cancer-clinically-localized-guideline (accessed October 28, 2020).
5. Barr RG, Cosgrove D, Brock M, Cantisani V, Correas JM, Postema AW, et al. WFUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 5. Prostate. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017; 43(1): 27–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.06.020