Abstract
This paper’s aim is to further current thinking around young men’s perceptions and understanding of violence, and the use of boxing as a vehicle in the prevention of repeat victimization. The focus is on the use of bodily or physical capital, and the ways in which men draw upon this resource to ward off attacks to identity and psyches, especially those perceived as disrespectful. It will draw on data from The Criminology of Boxing, Violence and Desistance (Jump 2020), and present overarching ideas from Tyrone, a psychosocial case study highlighting the underpinning theory and its development. This paper disrupts common discourses that argue that boxing is a panacea for all violence, and thus presents more subjective nuanced accounts of men’s lives in the gym, and the streets. In using the term “physical capital”, I employ Wacquant’s (1995) theory, and suggest that boxers not only use their body as a “form of capital” (p. 65), but that the physical capital accrued through the corporeal praxis of boxing, is actually a way to disavow prior victimization, and invest in the prevention of repeated traumatic scenarios.
Publisher
Onati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
Subject
Law,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference48 articles.
1. Anderson, E., 1999. Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: Norton.
2. Atyeo, D., 1979. Blood & Guts: Violence in Sports. New York: Grosset & Dunlap.
3. Blok, A., 1981. Rams and Billy Goats: A Key to the Mediterranean Code of Honour. Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland [online], 16(3), 427-440. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/2801293 [Access 25 September 2020].
4. Bourdieu, P., 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans.: R. Nice. London: Routledge.
5. Bourdieu, P., 1986. The Forms of Capital. In: J.G. Richardson, ed., Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, 241-258.