Abstract
This work provides a specific theoretical reading of the contemporary sociology of law promoted by Reza Banakar. Specifically, it investigates how the scholar approaches the relationship between law’s autonomy and justice claims through socio-legal lenses, and it proposes a partial understanding of his response. This response is critically interpreted in order to outline the potentialities and limitations of the author’s theoretical proposal. The analyses found in this work were operationalized from a bibliographic review of different sets of literature. In the end, the work highlights that, despite certain gaps, Banakar’s sociology of law has much to offer to the field, and it paves the way for the engagement of future socio-legal researchers interested in the different forms of intersection between law and justice in society.
Publisher
Onati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
Subject
Law,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference54 articles.
1. Alexy, R., 1985. A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2. Alexy, R., 1998. Law and correctness. Current Legal Problems [online], 51(1), 205-221. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/51.1.205 [Accessed 19 January 2021].
3. Alexy, R., 2000. On the thesis of a necessary connection between law and morality: Bulygin's critique. Ratio Juris [online], 13(2), 138-147. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00146 [Accessed 19 January 2021].
4. Alexy, R., 2002. The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5. Alexy, R., 2007. An Answer to Joseph Raz. In: G. Pavlakos, ed., Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy. Oxford: Hart, 37-58.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献