Competition and competitive environment from the view of the Austrian school

Author:

Zhuk Aleksander A.1ORCID,Vaganov Anton A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don

Abstract

A deep multifaceted study of the modern industry market's competitive environment is impossible to imagine without analyzing its qualitative and quantitative parameters, which represent a single integrated whole. When forming its own methodological approach to the decomposition of the market's competitive environment, each researcher faces the need to choose a relevant toolkit that meets the challenges of its current state. Usually, the works of modern authors, who are the followers of the institutional approach, are devoted to the analysis of the markets' competitive environment. Their works pay attention to the institutional structure of the competitive environment, as well as to the quantitative parameters of market agents' functioning. Nevertheless, in order to analyze the evolution of the competitive environment it is necessary to understand its previous states, as well as the scientific categorical apparatus through the prism of which the predecessors looked at it due to the modern socio-economic processes taking place at that time, as well as the discussion that took place in economic science in this or that period. The aim of the research is to analyze and compare the concepts of competition of representatives of the Austrian school. The object of the study is the theoretical concept of competition and competitive environment. The subject of the study is the evolution of the interpretation of these categories by the representatives of the Austrian school. The gap in the detailed understanding of the presence or absence of a coherent concept of competitive environment in some areas of economic science prompted us to turn to the works of representatives of the Austrian school in order to form a clear understanding of their vision of the competitive forces and the definition of the market competitive environment. Our research allowed systematizing and classifying the disparate opinions of the school's representatives into a single concept, which, in our opinion, opens up prospects for further research.

Publisher

RPO for the Promotion of Institutes DE RAS

Reference32 articles.

1. Böhm-Bawerk E. (2010). Capital and interest; Vol. II. Positive Theory of Capital; Vol. III. Further Essays on Capital and Interest. Transl. from English by V. Koshkin, ed. by A. V. Kuryaev. Cheljabinsk: Socium, 916 p. (in Russian).

2. Kirzner I. (2001). Competition and entrepreneurship. Transl. from English, ed. by Prof. A. N. Romanov. Moscow, UNITI–DANA, 239 p. (in Russian).

3. Kleiner G. B. (2023). The expanding universe of economic theory. Altereconomics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–8 (in Russian).

4. Polterovich, V.M. (1998). The crisis of economic theory. Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 1, pp. 46–66 (in Russian).

5. Tambovtsev V. L. (2003). Economic theory: crisis or renewal. Terra Economicus, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 24–27 (in Russian).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3