ALZHEIMER HASTALIĞINDA iNOS İNHİBİTÖRLERİNİN UMUT VERİCİ ROLÜ
-
Published:2023-10-23
Issue:1
Volume:48
Page:4-4
-
ISSN:1015-3918
-
Container-title:Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ankara Ecz. Fak. Derg.
Author:
MARIWAN AHMED Shkar1ORCID, TUGCU Gulcin1ORCID, KOKSAL AKKOC Meric1ORCID
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to explore the role of iNOS inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease (AD), a neurodegenerative disorder affecting millions worldwide. The main symptoms of AD include memory loss, cognitive decline, and behavioral changes. While the exact cause remains uncertain, both genetic and environmental factors are believed to contribute. Recent research has emphasized the significance of nitric oxide (NO) in AD development. Specifically, the upregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in AD patients leads to excessive NO production during neuronal inflammation, exacerbating AD and dementia. Therefore, the investigation focuses on the potential of iNOS inhibitors as a novel therapeutic approach for AD treatment.
Result and Discussion: In this review, we present the current therapeutic strategies available for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and explore the promising potential of iNOS inhibitors in AD treatment. Specifically, we will focus on their capacity to mitigate NO production and examine their potential neuroprotective effects. Additionally, this review will offer an overview of both natural and synthetic iNOS inhibitors, emphasizing the importance of safety considerations during the development of iNOS inhibitors as therapeutic interventions for AD.
Funder
istanbul yeditepe university
Publisher
Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi
Subject
Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacology
Reference40 articles.
1. 1. Lane, C.A., Hardy, J., Schott, J.M. (2017). Alzheimer’s disease. European Journal of Neurology, 25(1), 59-70. [CrossRef] 2. 2. Marhánková, J.H. (2023). The role of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in older adults’ representations of aging and anxieties regarding one’s own future. Journal of Aging Studies, 65, 101127. [CrossRef] 3. 3. Sramek, J.J., Cutler, N.R. (1999). Recent developments in the drug treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Drugs & Aging, 14(5), 359-373. [CrossRef] 4. 4. Rich, M.B., Blout Zawatsky, C.L., Botta, J.J., Christensen, K.D. (2023). Public perspective on medications to delay Alzheimer’s disease symptoms. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 32(5), 1009-1017. [CrossRef] 5. 5. Lanctôt, K.L., Amatniek, J., Ancoli-Israel, S., Arnold, S.E., Ballard, C., Cohen-Mansfield, J., Ismail, Z., Lyketsos, C., Miller, D.S., Musiek, E., Osorio, R.S., Rosenberg, P.B., Satlin, A., Steffens, D., Tariot, P., Bain, L.J., Carrillo, M.C., Hendrix, J.A., Jurgens, H., Boot, B. (2017). Neuropsychiatric signs and symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease: New treatment paradigms. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, 3(3), 440-449. [CrossRef]
|
|