Abstract
Objectives. The study aimed to analyze external load indicators with the incidence of non-contact hamstring injuries.
Material and methods. A non-experimental correlative, retrospective cohort study was carried out. The data were collected from 31 professional male soccer players over the course of one season. The following load indicators were examined: duration (D), total distance travelled (TDT), distance travelled at high intensity (DTHI) > 20km/h, number of efforts between 20-25 km/h (NE 20-25km/h), distance travelled at more than 25km/h (DR+25km/h), number of sprints greater than 25km/h (NE > 25km/h), number of accelerations greater than 1m/s² (Acc), and number of minor decelerations at -1m/s² (Dcc). Only non-contact hamstring injuries were included in the analysis. For the multivariate analysis, we applied a logistic regression model, where a value of P < 0.05 was established both for the statistical significance of the model (X²) and for each of the regressor variables (X²), the confidence interval level was 95%.
Results. Two injuries were recorded and diagnosed: injury grade 2 and muscle fatigue. The load indicators analyzed did not show a significant correlation with hamstring injury. Therefore, no association was found between external load and hamstring injury in professional soccer players.
Conclusions. The logistic regression model (p > 0.05) did not present statistical significance. Consequently, none of the external load variables monitored explain the rate of non-contact hamstring injuries in this population.
Reference33 articles.
1. García Romero, Á. (2022). Muscle biomarkers and external load in a professional soccer team. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 7960, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157960
2. Barnes, C., Archer, D., Hogg, B., Bush, M. & Bradley, P. (2014). The evolution of physical and technical performance parameters in the English Premier League. International Journal of Sports medicine, 35(13), 1095–1100. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1375695
3. Newton, M., Owen, A. & Baker, J. (2019). Monitoring External and Internal Training Loads: Relationships with Injury Risk in Professional Soccer: A Review. EC Orthopaedics, 10(8), 686–697. https://acortar.link/CtxzPM
4. Wallace, L., Slattery, K. & Coutts, A. (2014). A comparison of methods for quantifying training load: relationships between modeled and actual training responses. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 114(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-013-2745-1
5. Gabbett, T. (2016). The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder? British journal of sports medicine, 50(5), 273–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095788