Affiliation:
1. University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences
2. Baylor University
Abstract
Introduction: Simulation is commonly used to address interprofessional learning within healthcare programs to develop practice-ready clinicians. However, barriers such as scheduling, and discrepancy of learners’ knowledge and attitudes often pose challenges for educators to implement student-student (S-S) simulation-based interprofessional education (IPE). This study explored student perceptions about a novel simulation-based IPE mode in which students were paired with professionals from other disciplines.
Methods: The qualitative study explored 14 Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students’ perceptions about a simulated-learning activity with professionals from other disciplines. One-on-one semi-structured interviews with students from two private universities were analyzed using a constant comparative method to determine essential themes.
Results: Four main themes emerged from the student experiences: (1) guiding students in professional communication, (2) fostering interprofessional collaboration through a trusted experience, (3) realistic simulation to prepare for future clinical application, and (4) students value professional expertise in a simulated learning experience.
Discussion: Students expressed positive perceptions about student-professional (S-Pr) simulation-based IPE. Student-professional simulation-based IPE may provide new opportunities that advance learning outcomes and increase engagement while minimizing barriers of other modes of IPE. Comparison between S-S and S-Pr modes is needed to determine efficacy and best practices.
Publisher
University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences Library
Reference29 articles.
1. Aebersold, M. (2016). The history of simulation and its impact on the future. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 27(1), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2016436
2. Alanazi, A., Nicholson, N., & Thomas, S. (2017). The use of simulation training to improve knowledge, skills, and confidence among healthcare students: A systematic review. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2017.1666
3. Barzansky, B., Borasky, S., Wall, J. R., Vlasses, P. H., Zorek, J. A., & Brandt, B. F. (2019). Guidance on developing quality interprofessional education for the health professions. Health Professions Accreditors Collaborative. https://healthprofessionsaccreditors.org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/02/HPACGuidance02-01-19.pdf
4. Becker, L. R. & Hermosura, B. A. (2019). Simulation education theory. In S. Deering, T. C. Auguste, & D. Goffman (eds.), Comprehensive healthcare simulation: Obstetrics and Gynecology (pp. 11-24). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98995-2_2
5. Bridges, D. R., Davidson, R. A., Odegard, P. S., Maki, I. V., & Tomkowiak, J. (2011). Interprofessional collaboration: Three best practice models of interprofessional education. Medical Education Online, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035