Author:
Causholli Monika,Chambers Dennis J.,Payne Jeff L.
Abstract
SUMMARY
A recently published academic study by Causholli, Chambers, and Payne (2014) brings new evidence to a long-standing debate about whether the provision of non-audit services (NAS) can impair auditor independence. Prior research on this question has largely found no evidence of lower financial reporting quality when auditors provide high levels of NAS. By considering the potential that future NAS, rather than current NAS levels, could impair auditor independence, Causholli et al. (2014) bring a fresh perspective on the question. They argue that it is the potential for new NAS revenue that would most likely cause auditors to have impaired independence. They find strong evidence that audit quality suffers when clients are willing to purchase future NAS from their auditor.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Reference18 articles.
1. Do non-audit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence;Ashbaugh;The Accounting Review,2003
2. Non-audit service fees, auditor characteristics, and earnings restatements;Bloomfield;Managerial Auditing Journal,2008
3. How nonaudit services affect objectivity;Brandon;CPA Journal,2009
4. Future non-audit service fees and audit quality;Causholli;Contemporary Accounting Research,2014
5. Coffee, J. C.Jr.
2006. Gatekeepers: The Professions and Corporate Governance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献