Two Sides of the Same Coin: The Good and Bad of Alumni Affiliation during Auditor Evidence Collection

Author:

Earley Christine E.1ORCID,Kuselias Stephen G.1ORCID,MacKenzie Nikki L.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Providence College

2. Georgia Institute of Technology

Abstract

ABSTRACT Regulators and researchers express concern about auditors who leave their firms for employment at their clients, due to lingering relationships which might represent a threat to audit quality. These relationships could negatively impact audit quality through undue influences of the client personnel on auditor judgment. We examine how these relationships influence novice auditors during evidence collection. Understanding the effects of alumni affiliation on evidence collection is important because undiscovered issues at this phase may go unaddressed, potentially hurting audit quality. Contrary to most research findings, we find that alumni affiliation can benefit the audit by increasing auditors’ evidence collection. However, we also find, when auditors become depleted, the benefits of alumni affiliation actually reverse, as auditors overrely on the relationship, leading them to prematurely cease evidence collection. These findings have implications for both practitioners and researchers. Data Availability: Data are available from the authors upon request.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting

Reference64 articles.

1. The effects of alternative justification memos on the judgments of audit reviewees and reviewers;Agoglia,;Journal of Accounting Research,2003

2. AU Section 500: Audit Evidence;American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA),2021

3. Theory testing and process evidence in accounting experiments;Asay,;The Accounting Review,2022

4. Social identity theory and the organization;Ashforth,;Academy of Management Review,1989

5. Auditors’ identification with their clients and its effect on auditors’ objectivity;Bamber,;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3