Integrating Professionally Oriented Faculty: Views of Professionally Oriented Faculty, Tenure-Track Faculty, and Administrators

Author:

Knight Margaret E.1ORCID,Hermanson Dana R.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Creighton University

2. Kennesaw State University

Abstract

ABSTRACT Based on a survey of professionally oriented (PO) accounting faculty, tenure-track faculty, and administrators, we examine the integration of PO faculty members into accounting departments. We find fairly positive views regarding PO faculty members' integration into accounting departments, the leveraging of PO faculty members' skills, and PO faculty members' contribution to achieving departmental missions. However, PO faculty are less positive than others about their integration and the leveraging of their skills, and they are more positive than tenure-track faculty about their contribution to achieving departmental missions. PO faculty primarily contribute in teaching and service, with limited research focus. We find evidence of needed improvements in PO faculty benefits, with broad support for certain improvements, but PO faculty are significantly more likely than others to offer specific suggestions for change. We offer four action steps primarily to bolster the strategic and decision-making roles of PO faculty.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Education,Accounting

Reference26 articles.

1. Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession (ACAP). 2008. Final Report of the Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Treasury.

2. American Institute of CPAs and National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (AICPA and NASBA). 2021. Accounting Program Curriculum Gap Analysis. Durham, NC: AICPA and NASBA.

3. Anderson, U. L., Christ M. H., Johnstone K. M., and RittenbergL. E. 2012. A post-SOX examination of factors associated with the size of internal audit functions. Accounting Horizons26 ( 2): 167– 191. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50115

4. Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). 2003. Sustaining Scholarship in Business Schools. St. Louis, MO: AACSB.

5. Bailey, C., Hermanson D. R., and LouwersT. J. 2008. An examination of the peer review process in accounting journals. Journal of Accounting Education26 ( 2): 55– 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2008.04.001

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3