Tax-Rate Biases in Tax Decisions: Experimental Evidence

Author:

Amberger Harald J.1ORCID,Eberhartinger Eva1ORCID,Kasper Matthias2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. WU Vienna University of Economics and Business

2. University of Vienna

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates biases in tax decisions. In a series of four laboratory experiments with 303 students and 62 tax professionals, we document a systematic tax-rate bias in decisions under time constraints. Specifically, decision makers overestimate the relevance of less complex tax-rate information compared to more complex tax-base information. This behavior leads to suboptimal tax decisions. We also find that decision making, on average, is unaffected by professional experience: Students and tax professionals are similarly prone to tax-rate bias. However, senior tax professionals are more rationally inattentive. These decision makers are less likely to exhibit a tax-rate bias when exhibiting such bias is relatively costly. Overall, our findings suggest that resource constraints impede the use of complex tax-base information, which results in suboptimal tax decisions. Interviews with senior tax professionals indicate potential for tax-rate biases in real-world tax decisions and thereby provide directions for future research. JEL Classifications: C91; D03; H32; K34; M21; M41.

Funder

FWF Der Wissenschaftsfonds

Oesterreichische Nationalbank

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Finance,Accounting

Reference71 articles.

1. Complex tax incentives;Abeler;American Economic Journal: Economic Policy,2015

2. Is the Haig-Simons standard dead? The uneasy case for a comprehensive income tax;Alm;National Tax Journal,2018

3. Using laboratory experiments in public economics;Alm;National Tax Journal,2007

4. A critical review of qualitative interviews;Alsaawi;European Journal of Business and Social Sciences,2014

5. Students as surrogates in behavioral accounting research: Some evidence;Ashton;Journal of Accounting Research,1980

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3