The Utilization of Quantitative and Qualitative Information in Groups' Capital Investment Decisions

Author:

Ang Nicole P.1,Trotman Ken T.1

Affiliation:

1. UNSW Australia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Organizations frequently use interactive groups to make strategic decisions, aiming to capitalize on individual members' unique knowledge. However, research shows that groups focus on information that members have in common, not unique information, resulting in suboptimal outcomes. Given that accounting systems can present information in various forms, we experimentally examine whether quantitative information results in greater information sharing and use than qualitative information. We take advantage of a rich dataset created by videoing groups making a capital investment decision. Consistent with prior research, we find that groups prefer common to unique information, regardless of whether it is quantitative or qualitative. However, individuals use quantitative information more than qualitative information before group interaction, and make more references to it during discussion. Added insights from the videos include identifying what determines greater use of quantitative cues, the importance of the numbers attached to cues, and how successful groups use quantitative cues. Data Availability: Please contact the authors.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Accounting

Reference55 articles.

1. Knowledge-based support for combining qualitative and quantitative judgments in resource allocation decisions;Agarwal;Journal of Management Information Systems,1992

2. Baron, R., N. Kerr, and N. Miller. 1992. Group Process, Group Decision, Group Action. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.

3. Bonner, S. E. 2008. Judgment and Decision Making in Accounting. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

4. The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The effects of prediscussion dissent;Brodbeck;European Journal of Social Psychology,2002

5. Market responses to qualitative information from a group polarization perspective;Burton;Accounting, Organizations and Society,2006

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3