Affiliation:
1. Stanford University
2. Dartmouth College
3. CentER, Tilburg University
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the use of a cost-sharing arrangement (CSA) by a multinational corporation (MNC) to shift the income attributable to intangible property (IP) to low-tax foreign jurisdictions. We identify three major effects that determine whether an MNC will use a CSA to develop the IP rather than develop the IP domestically: an operating intangible effect, an undervaluation effect, and an enforcement effect. First, we find that the MNC is more likely to use a CSA to develop the IP when the MNC has valuable domestic operating intangibles, such as a global brand. Second, the MNC is more likely to use a CSA if the nature of the IP development project allows the MNC to understate the fair market value of the IP. Third, the MNC is less likely to use a CSA if the tax authority can cost effectively challenge the position and impose retroactive revaluations of the IP.
JEL Classifications: H25; D23.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Reference31 articles.
1. Boos, M.
2003. International Transfer Pricing: The Valuation of Intangible Assets. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
2. Cost sharing and the acrobatics of arm's length taxation;Brauner;Intertax,2010
3. Chorvat, E.
2015. “Looking Through” Corporate Expatriations for Buried Intangibles. Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
4. Uncertainty, industrial structure, and the speed of R&D;Dasgupta;The Bell Journal of Economics,1980
5. De Simone, L., J.Huang, and L.Krull.
2018. Foreign Profitability and the Rising Foreign R&D of U.S. Multinational Corporations. Working paper, Stanford University, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, and University of Oregon.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献