Affiliation:
1. The George Washington University.
2. Lancaster University.
3. University of Southern California.
Abstract
Practitioners in Europe and the U.S. recently have proposed two distinct approaches to address what they believe are shortcomings of traditional budgeting practices. One approach advocates improving the budgeting process and primarily focuses on the planning problems with budgeting. The other advocates abandoning the budget and primarily focuses on the performance evaluation problems with budgeting. This paper provides an overview and research perspective on these two recent developments. We discuss why practitioners have become dissatisfied with budgets, describe the two distinct approaches, place them in a research context, suggest insights that may aid the practitioners, and use the practitioner perspectives to identify fruitful areas for research.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference141 articles.
1. The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control system design
2. See Covaleski et al. (2003) in this forum for a discussion of how theories from economics, psychology, and sociology, not just research methods, can be integrated to provide important bases to enrich budgeting theory and research.
3. Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations
Cited by
219 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献