Affiliation:
1. University of Southern Denmark.
2. University of British Columbia.
3. University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
Abstract
We consider a setting in which a firm uses residual income to motivate a manager's investment decision. Textbooks often recommend adjusting the residual income capital charge for market risk, but not for firmspecific risk. We demonstrate two basic flaws in this recommendation. First, the capital charge should not be adjusted for market risk. Charging a market risk premium results in “double” counting because a risk-averse manager will personally consider this risk. Second, while investors can avoid firm-specific risk through diversification, a manager cannot. If the manager faces significant firm-specific risk at the time he makes his investment decision, then it is optimal to charge him less than the riskless return so as to partially offset his reluctance to undertake risky investments. On the other hand, the manager will vary his investment decisions with the pre-decision information he receives, which accentuates his compensation risk, and the firm must compensate him for bearing this additional risk. Hence, if the manager will receive relatively precise pre-decision information, then it is optimal to charge him more than the riskless return to reduce the variability of his investment decisions.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference33 articles.
1. Anthony, R. N., and V. Govindarajan. 2000. Management Control Systems. 10th edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill / Irwin.
2. Capital Rationing and Organizational Slack in Capital Budgeting
3. Atkinson, A. A., and G. A. Feltham. 1981. Information in capital markets: An agency theory perspective. Working paper, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
4. Accounting income, stock price, and managerial compensation
Cited by
73 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献