'Till Death Do Us Part: An Examination of the Impact of Unbroken Auditor-Client Relationships on Audit Efficiency and Audit Quality

Author:

Robinson Dahlia1,Smith Thomas1ORCID,Walton Stephanie2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of South Florida

2. Louisiana State University

Abstract

SUMMARY We examine whether audit engagements where the client has never switched auditors (original auditors) are associated with different audit fee and audit quality outcomes, relative to engagements that have experienced an auditor change. We document that clients with original auditors accrue nontrivial audit fee savings. Further, we find original auditor engagements are associated with lower levels of discretionary accruals and lower likelihood of misstatements, implying higher audit quality. We also find that investors appear to recognize the audit fee and quality benefits, as these auditors receive fewer votes from investors against their ratification. These results are consistent with a reduction in information asymmetry from greater client specific knowledge with original auditors, leading to more efficient and effective audits. Finally, we document that the audit fee and audit quality benefits diminish for engagements that exceed 40 years, providing some support for the benefit of an eventual fresh look in the audit. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: G18; H83; M4.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting

Reference76 articles.

1. Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence;Ashbaugh,;The Accounting Review,2003

2. Auditors' identification with their clients and its effect on auditors' objectivity;Bamber,;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,2007

3. BDO Seidman. 2016. Comment letter submitted to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).https://pcaobus.org/Rulemaking/Docket034/039c_BDO.pdf

4. Audit firm tenure, non-audit services, and internal assessments of audit quality;Bell,;Journal of Accounting Research,2015

5. Accounting discretion: Use or abuse? An analysis of restructuring charges surrounding regulator actions;Bens,;Contemporary Accounting Research,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3