Comparative effect of three polishing systems on porcelain surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding and composite resin removal: An atomic force microscopy

Author:

Qabel Faeze1,Talaei Riehane2,Saeedi Saeedeh1,Ghorbani Raheb34,Ameli Nazila5

Affiliation:

1. Student Research Committee, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran,

2. Departments of Restorative, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran,

3. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran,

4. Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran,

5. Departments of Orthodontics, Dental School, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran,

Abstract

Purpose: Porcelain polishing after orthodontic bracket debonding and resin removal is imperative to eliminate surface roughness and minimize the risk of plaque accumulation, periodontal disease, and porcelain discoloration. This study aimed to assess the effect of three polishing systems on porcelain surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding. Materials and Methods: Thirty porcelain blocks were divided into three groups. Surface roughness of the samples was first measured using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and recorded as baseline. Orthodontic brackets were bonded to blocks by composite resin. After bracket debonding, resin remnants were removed by tungsten carbide bur. The blocks were then polished with Sof-Lex discs, Meisinger, and Jota porcelain polishing kit. Surface roughness was measured again using AFM. The Shapiro–Wilk test, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s post hoc test were used for data analysis through SPSS version 18.0. Level of significance was set at 5%. Results: The mean change in surface roughness after polishing with Jota kit (56.6 nm) was significantly greater than that compared to Sof-Lex discs (10.7 nm) (P = 0.003) and Meisinger kit (26.6 nm) (P = 0.024). The mean change in surface roughness was not significantly different between Sof-Lex and Meisinger groups. Surface roughness significantly increased in all three groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Meisinger polishing kit and Sof-Lex discs were not significantly different in terms of the resultant surface roughness. Thus, the conventional use of Sof-Lex discs seems to be more cost-effective due to their lower cost.

Publisher

Scientific Scholar

Reference34 articles.

1. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: A systematic review;Bach;Angle Orthod,2014

2. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain surface: In vitro study;Sabuncuoglu;J Istanb Univ Fac Dent,2016

3. Dental ceramics: Part II-recent advances in dental ceramics;Datla;Am J Mater Eng Technol,2015

4. In vitro orthodontic bracket bonding to porcelain;Al-Hity;Eur J Orthod,2012

5. The effects of porcelain finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of feldspathic porcelain: An in vitro study;Shetty;Univ Res J Den,2014

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3