Author:
Stobberingh E E,Houben A W,van Boven C P
Abstract
Three commercial available tobramycin assays, the fluorescent immunoassay (AMES), the Diagnostic Products Corp. radioimmunoassay, and the Nuclear Medical System radioimmunoassay, were compared with the microbiological assay and the chemical assay involving high-performance liquid chromatography. The results obtained with each assay were evaluated in terms of usefulness, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference25 articles.
1. Assay of gentamicin in serum by high pressure liquid chromatography;Anhalt J. P.;Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,1977
2. Chemical assay, involving liquid chromatography for aminoglycoside antibiotics in serum;Bick S.;Clin. Chem.,1979
3. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method;Bauer A. W.;Am. J. Clin. Pathol.,1966
4. A comparative study of the ototoxicity of tobramycin and gentamicin;Brummett R. E.;Arch. Otolaryngol.,1972
5. Burd J. F. S. G. Thompson azid C. A. Miller. 1980. Substrate-labeled fluorescent immunoassays for measuring levels of the aminoglycoside antibiotics gentamicin sisomicin netilmicin tobramycin kanamycin and amikacin p. 517-519. In J. D. Nelson and C. Grassi (ed.) Current chemotherapy and infectious disease American Society for Microbiology Washington D.C.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献