Molecular determinants of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Sierra Leone

Abstract

ABSTRACT Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) management has become a serious global health challenge. Understanding its epidemic determinants on the regional level is crucial for developing effective control measures. We used whole genome sequencing data of 238 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) strains to determine drug resistance profiles, phylogeny, and transmission dynamics of MDR/rifampicin-resistant (RR) MTBC strains from Sierra Leone. Forty-two strains were classified as RR, 196 as MDR, 5 were resistant to bedaquiline (BDQ) and clofazimine (CFZ), but none was found to be resistant to fluoroquinolones. Sixty-one (26%) strains were resistant to all first-line drugs, three of which had additional resistance to BDQ/CFZ. The strains were classified into six major MTBC lineages (L), with strains of L4 being the most prevalent, 62% ( n = 147), followed by L6 ( Mycobacterium africanum ) strains, (21%, n = 50). The overall clustering rate (using ≤d12 single-nucleotide polymorphism threshold) was 44%, stratified into 31 clusters ranging from 2 to 16 strains. The largest cluster ( n = 16) was formed by sublineage 2.2.1 Beijing Ancestral 3 strains, which developed MDR several times. Meanwhile, 10 of the L6 strains had a primary MDR transmission. We observed a high diversity of drug resistance mutations, including borderline resistance mutations to isoniazid and rifampicin, and mutations were not detected by commercial assays. In conclusion, one in five strains investigated was resistant to all first-line drugs, three of which had evidence of BDQ/CFZ resistance. Implementation of interventions such as rapid diagnostics that prevent further resistance development and stop MDR-TB transmission chains in the country is urgently needed. IMPORTANCE A substantial proportion of MDR-TB strains in Sierra Leone were resistant against all first line drugs; however this makes the all-oral-six-month BPaLM regimen or other 6-9 months all oral regimens still viable, mainly because there was no FQ resistance.Resistance to BDQ was detected, as well as RR, due to mutations outside of the hotspot region. While the prevalence of those resistances was low, it is still cause for concern and needs to be closely monitored.