Assessment of Resolution and Intercenter Reproducibility of Results of Genotyping Staphylococcus aureus by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis of Sma I Macrorestriction Fragments: a Multicenter Study

Author:

van Belkum Alex1,van Leeuwen Willem1,Kaufmann Mary Elizabeth2,Cookson Barry2,Forey Françoise3,Etienne Jerome3,Goering Richard4,Tenover Fred5,Steward Christine5,O’Brien Frances6,Grubb Warren6,Tassios Panayotis7,Legakis Nicholas7,Morvan Anne8,El Solh Névine8,de Ryck Raf9,Struelens Marc9,Salmenlinna Saara10,Vuopio-Varkila Jaana10,Kooistra Mirjam11,Talens Adriaan11,Witte Wolfgang12,Verbrugh Henri1

Affiliation:

1. Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands1;

2. Central Public Health Laboratory, London NW9 5HT, United Kingdom2;

3. Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 69437 Lyon Cedex 3, France3;

4. Creighton University School of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Omaha, Nebraska 681784;

5. Nosocomial Pathogens Laboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 303335;

6. School of Biomedical Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, Perth 6845, Australia6;

7. Department of Microbiology, Medical School, National University of Athens, 115 27 Athens, Greece7;

8. Institut Pasteur, Centre National de Référence des Staphylocoques, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France8;

9. Department of Microbiology, Hôpital Erasme, 1070 Brussels, Belgium9;

10. National Public Health Institute, 00300 Helsinki, Finland10;

11. Regional Laboratory for Public Health, 9700 RM Groningen, The Netherlands11; and

12. Robert Koch Institute BGA, D-38855 Wernigerode, Germany12

Abstract

ABSTRACT Twenty well-characterized isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were used to study the optimal resolution and interlaboratory reproducibility of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of DNA macrorestriction fragments. Five identical isolates (one PFGE type), 5 isolates that produced related PFGE subtypes, and 10 isolates with unique PFGE patterns were analyzed blindly in 12 different laboratories by in-house protocols. In several laboratories a standardized PFGE protocol with a commercial kit was applied successfully as well. Eight of the centers correctly identified the genetic homogeneity of the identical isolates by both the in-house and standard protocols. Four of 12 laboratories failed to produce interpretable data by the standardized protocol, due to technical problems (primarily plug preparation). With the five related isolates, five of eight participants identified the same subtype interrelationships with both in-house and standard protocols. However, two participants identified multiple strain types in this group or classified some of the isolates as unrelated isolates rather than as subtypes. The remaining laboratory failed to distinguish differences between some of the related isolates by utilizing both the in-house and standardized protocols. There were large differences in the relative genome lengths of the isolates as calculated on the basis of the gel pictures. By visual inspection, the numbers of restriction fragments and overall banding pattern similarity in the three groups of isolates showed interlaboratory concordance, but centralized computer analysis of data from four laboratories yielded percent similarity values of only 85% for the group of identical isolates. The differences between the data sets obtained with in-house and standardized protocols could be the experimental parameters which differed with respect to the brand of equipment used, imaging software, running time (20 to 48 h), and pulsing conditions. In conclusion, it appears that the standardization of PFGE depends on controlling a variety of experimental intricacies, as is the case with other bacterial typing procedures.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

Cited by 168 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3