Author:
Martin E T,Cote J A,Perry L K,Martin W J
Abstract
A bioluminescence method for screening urine cultures to provide rapid reporting of negative specimens and to select appropriate urine cultures for direct application of automated identification methods was evaluated. A total of 2,000 specimens were processed in the Lumac Biocounter (3M, St. Paul, Minn.), and the results were compared with quantitative culture techniques by using a 0.001-ml inoculating loop. A total of 841 specimens were positive by the bioluminescence method; 291 specimens were culture positive (greater than or equal to 50,000 CFU of one or two organisms per ml). Positive cultures represented more than 20 different organisms. Approximately two-thirds of the false-positive results represented mixed flora or pure cultures of less than 5 X 10(4) organisms per ml. The predictive value of a negative result was 98.4%, reflecting a false-negative rate of only 0.7%. No advantages in cost or technician time were noted, but the Lumac method appears to be a useful technique in decreasing reporting time, especially for negative urine cultures.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference9 articles.
1. Clinical evaluation of a bacteriuria detection device for urine screening;Davis J. R.;Am. J. Clin. Pathol.,1984
2. Rapid method for identification and susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli bacteriuria;Dennstedt F. E.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1983
3. Comparison of the Lumac and Monolight systems for detection of bacteriuria by bioluminescence;Drow D. L.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1984
4. Finegold S. M. and W. J. Martin. 1982. Bailey and Scott's diagnostic microbiology 6th ed. p. 705. The C. V. Mosby Co. St. Louis.
5. Urinary colony counts: 1984;Fuchs P. C.;Med. Lab. Observer,1984
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献