Abstract
Athymic (nude) mice, their normal littermates, and Swiss white mice were infected with 750 oocysts of Eimeria falciformis var. pragensis and reinfected twice with 20,000 oocysts, 20 and 40 days after the primary infection. The prepatent and patent periods of the primary infection were similar in each group of mice; however, the athymic mice discharged more oocysts. The normal littermates and Swiss white mice developed immunity to the parasite after the first or second infection, whereas the athymic mice never developed immunity. Infection with E. falciformis var. pragensis induced the production of antibodies in the normal littermates and Swiss white mice, whereas antibody production was impaired in athymic mice. Passive administration of immune serum did not protect athymic mice from reinfection by the parasite. Immunity to the parasite was thymus dependent, and "effector" T-lymphocytes seemed to be required for protection.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Immunology,Microbiology,Parasitology
Reference31 articles.
1. Augustin R. and A. P. Ridges. 1963. Immunity mechanisms in Eimeria meleagrimitis p. 296-325. In P. C. C. Garnham A. E. Pierce and I. Roitt (ed.) Immunity to protozoa. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford.
2. etude comparee des relations morphologiques et immunologiques chez les coccidies de la souris: Eimeria falciformis et Eimeria pragensis (Coccidia: Eimeriidae);Cernia J.;Folia Parasitol. (Prague),1974
3. Husbandry of the "Nude;Eaton G. J.;Lab. Anim. Sci.,1975
4. Attempted passive immunization of young calves against Eimeria bovis;Fitzgerald P. R.;J. Protozool.,1964
5. The natural history and immunopathology of outbred athymic (nude) mice;Gershwin M. E.;Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol.,1975
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献